Guys, we are back again with another interesting comparison for you. Today we have two high-end devices from the gaming monitor segment, Asus PG35VQ, and Acer Predator X35. We will compare these devices to know which one really deserves your consideration.

Pros and Cons

Asus PG35VQAcer Predator X35
Strong gaming experienceUnreal picture, especially with HDR enabled
High refresh rate with very low lag200Hz refresh rate with G-Sync Ultimate
Curved panelPlenty of additional gaming features
Extremely expensivePrice is very prohibitive
Some black smearing still an
issue on moving content
Speakers are average

Key Specification

Asus PG35VQAcer Predator X35
BrandAsusAcer Predator
Model PG35VQX35
Gaming MonitorYes CurvedYes Curved
Weight with Stand13.6 kg13.38 kg
Dimension833.0 x 549.0 x 306.0 mm833.1 x 581.7 x 309.9 mm
Power Consumption64 W77.2 W

Walking into, the Acer Predator X35 gaming monitor features a committed G-SYNC v2 module, which implements a shifting refresh rate up to 200Hz for tear-free gameplay without any stuttering or obvious input delay attached. Retain in intellect that G-SYNC doesn’t run among AMD cards on this monitor.

For beginners, there’s the specification it gets a curved widescreen including a 3440 x 1440 resolution, Nvidia G-Sync Ultimate, DisplayHDR 1000 adaptability, and a huge 200Hz overclocked refresh rate and going on and on.


Asus PG35VQAcer Predator X35
Display TypeVA LCDVA LCD
Size35 inch35 inch
Dynamic Contrast Ratio2500:12500:1
CurvedYes 1800RYes 1800R
Aspect ratio21:921:9
Resolution3440 x 1440 pixel3440 x 1440 pixel
Pixel Density109 PPI106 PPI
Response Time2 ms (GtG)2 ms (Overdrive)
Refresh Rate200 Hz180 Hz

Start with the Asus PG35VQ, there very few gaming monitors that can match the ROG Swift PG35VQ’s feature collection. The primary point, to begin with, is G-Sync Ultimate Nvidia’s most reliable syncing technology. The ROG Swift PG35VQ’s G-Sync remains clocked to operate among a default refresh rate of 180Hz, which remains more solid than the largest of the different monitors available in the market also this can do overclocked to operate through 200Hz. That’s tremendous pace; sufficient to obtain e-sports headlines and single-player competitions seem amazingly smooth. Presentations with G-Sync Ultimate own each of the conventional trappings from Nvidia’s syncing service, however, they additionally present 1000 nits of backlight intensity, which suggests they can sync while delivering top-notch HDR pictures.

RELATED:  ViewSonic VG2440V Video Conferencing Monitor Review

Moving towards the image quality of the Acer Predator X35 remains equally beneficial while it gets during it proceeds to HDR images on LED-backlit monitors. Among simply under 5ms of input lag, the monitor has no obvious lags whatsoever; the moment the display uses to respond and display your commands is instantaneous. There are three response time overdrive choices: Off, Normal, and Extreme. We suggest utilizing the Normal mode since it doesn’t give as much overshoot as ‘Extreme’ yet it remains pretty effective in lowering ghosting and motion blur. Concerning a VA panel display, there’s minimum smearing and motion blur noticeable! The response time works a little adversely while local dimming is allowed during which situation the Extreme mode serves more enjoyable. There are further three various backlight response modes: Desktop, Gaming, and Hybrid. We recommend using the Gaming mode here since it has the smallest number of practice and no additional limitations.


Asus PG35VQAcer Predator X35
HDMI2.0 x 12.0 x 1
DisplayPort1.4 x 11.4 x 1
Audio Output3.5 mmNo
USB3.1 x 1 Input
3.1 x 2 Output
Type-A x 1
Type-B x 4
Built-in SpeakersNoYes, 2 x 4W
G-SYNC SupportYesYes
FreeSync SupportNoNo

Driving towards connectivity options Asus PG35VQ and Acer Predator X35 both devices comes with a 2.0 HDMI port and 1.4 DisplayPort. Talking about USB options they both have ample amount of USB slots Asus has one 3.1 input and 2 3.1 output, on the other hand, Acer gets one Type-A and four Type-B USB. Talking about Asus won’t get any inbuilt speaker setup but with Acer, you do get a dual speaker setup of 4W and that has a decent sound quality.

RELATED:  Huawei MateView GT Review: Monitor Dedicated to Gamers


Asus PG35VQAcer Predator X35
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz100-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyExternalExternal

Going into the power options the Asus monitor consumes a lesser 64W but the Acer monitor consumes more 77.2W of power and the power consumption of the Acer monitor is more than the other monitors comes in this category in the market. Also, both require an external power supply adaptor which may be inconvenient for some users.

Which is better!

Look both of these monitors get have the same display size and also get identical features. So we can say that both of these monitors are very identical in terms of design and features. But though they both hold their own positive and negative points. Both of these devices served on a different price point in the market so it is very up to you. You can go for one of these two which fits in your budget perfectly.