Connect with us

CPU

Comparision: Intel Core i5-7600K vs i7-7700K

Intel has enjoyed in recent years, the specter of further stagnation was not very optimistic. Especially after a fairly large, at least compared to previous architectures, the increase in performance, which Skylake processors provided compared to Haswell,  undoubtedly stimulated consumers’ appetites. Even with fairly credible leaks, pre-premiere guesses are, however, only assumptions that are high time to verify.

General Info

i5-7600Ki7-7700K
PriceCHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
CPU Model7600K7700K
Manufacturing Process14 nm14 nm
Maximum CPU Configuration1S1S
Number of PCIe Lanes16 Lanes16 Lanes
UnlockedYesYes
Architecture codenameSkylakeSkylake
Release dateJanuary 3, 2017January 3, 2017

i5-7600K

The Intel Core i5-7600K has four cores, while its base clock is 3.8 GHz. Under load, thanks to Turbo Boost technology, this value increases to a maximum of 4.2 GHz, while at rest – it drops to 0.8 GHz. The standard supply voltage varies between 0.7 and 1.3 volts depending on the task currently being performed. These are, of course, values ​​very similar to those that characterized the previous LGA 1151 processors from the Skylake family. This CPU is equipped with 4×256 KB second-level cache and 6 MB L3 cache, so also, in this respect, there are no differences to the Core i5-6600K.

i7-7700K

The parameters of the Core i7-7700K are identical to the weaker model. The most obvious difference is the support for Hyper-Threading technology, which allows each core to execute two threads simultaneously and thus maximize the use of internal resources. In addition, the i7-7700K has a base clock of 4.2 GHz, which can go up to a maximum of 4.5 GHz. There is also more L3 cache, this time we find 8 MB.

Performance

i5-7600Ki7-7700K
Number of Cores4 Cores4 Cores
CPU Threads48
Base Clock Speed3.8 GHz4.2GHz
Maximum Boost Speed4.2 GHz4.8GHz
L3 Cache6MB8MB
CPU SpeedDMI3 (8 GT/s)DMI3 (8 GT/s)

The temperature in the room ranged from 21-23 ° C. The HWiNFO64 software version 5.43-3055 was used to perform the measurements. The air cooling set – Scythe Mugen MAX was watching over the correct working conditions of the processors. The thermally conductive paste used is Noctua NT-H1, characterized by the lack of the need to heat up, thanks to which it achieves optimal performance immediately after application.

One of the Kaby Lake jokes we have noticed while browsing popular IT forums is temperature measurements. Of course, it is about “mustard” under the IHS instead of high-quality thermal paste, preferably simply soldering. It is not that bad in practice because to cool the Core i7-7700K processor overclocked to around 5 GHz, a medium-performance cooler is enough. The cheaper i5-7600K is slightly cooler due to the lack of Hyper-Threading technology, which significantly increases heat generation. Nevertheless, the new products note an increase in temperatures than their predecessors from the Skylake family, which clearly proves that a better thermally conductive material would definitely be here. What if the popularity of removing the “caps” from the CPU and applying CLP will certainly not fall.

Memory Support

i5-7600Ki7-7700K
Maximum Capacity64 GB64 GB
Memory SupportDDR3L 1333, 1600 MHz
DDR4 2133, 2400 MHz
DDR4-2133/2400,
DDR3L-1333/1600
ECC MemoryNoNo
Channel ArchitectureDual-ChannelDual-Channel
RAM Speed2400 Mhz2400 Mhz
Maximum Memory Bandwidth38.4GB/s38.4GB/s

Integrated Graphics

i5-7600Ki7-7700K
Graphics ChipsetIntel® UHD Graphics 630Intel® HD Graphics 630
Maximum Resolution Support4096 x 2304 at 60 Hz4096 x 2304 at 60 Hz
Supported APIsOpenGL:4.5
DirectX:12
OpenGl:4.5
DirectX:12
Output SupporteDP, DisplayPort, HDMIeDP, DisplayPort, HDMI
Base Clock Speed350MHz350MHz

Benchmarks

i5-7600Ki7-7700K
PassMark result (single)92779736
Cinebench R20 (single) result23962776
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 result (single)

Conclusion!

The biggest advantage of the tested Core i5-7600K and i7-7700K is undoubtedly the high overclocking capabilities, comparable to Sandy Bridge processors, which were considered a model in this aspect since their premiere. 5 GHz, easily achievable with air cooling, is a result that can be respected. The debutants are also looking solid in terms of performance, delivering about 10% more performance than their predecessors in the Skylake family.

Kaby Lake is undoubtedly a solid product but not fully meeting the expectations associated with it.

RELATED:  Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i3-9100F

So what are the disadvantages? The most obvious one is the lack of performance increase per clock cycle. This is the first such case in Intel’s offer for a long time that the new products did not offer something more in this respect than their direct predecessors. Even if the differences were as small as in the case of Ivy Bridge, which family was characterized by a few percent stronger thread than the aforementioned Sandy Bridge, the consumer still got the improved architecture in his hands. However, this time, the entire increase in performance is due to the raised clocks, which is not to be proud of. The operating temperatures, which have increased concerning Skylake, can also be perceived negatively. Of course, we are not able to say 100% whether this is only the effect of saving on thermal paste for IHS or whether the calibration of the sensors has also changed, but all this does not change the fact that the “glut” served to us by Intel for a long time ceased to be tasty. The more so that you do not pay little for processors with an unlocked multiplier.

The question that remains is the final verdict. In light of the above arguments,  that both tested processors deserve four stars. Of course, at the moment, we do not know the average price in stores, but it remains to be hoped that after the initial turmoil, it will stabilize at a level similar to that of the Skylake family. Who could I recommend the more expensive Core i7-7700K? First of all, people willing to use it for semi-professional applications, especially combining the creative process with the final rendering. In viewports, Kaby Lake will feel like a fish in the water, thanks to the high OC and the associated high power of a single core. Nevertheless, the competition from HEDT platforms is fierce, making the decision unlikely to be easy. In turn, the Core i5-7600K is a good choice for players who have 120+ Hz monitors paired with powerful graphics cards and, therefore, aim for maximum frames per second. Such a powerful CPU will also be useful for people who prefer more FPS at the expense of lower graphics settings. On the other hand, players who can come to terms with the relatively low liquidity, but while maintaining maximum details, should rather be interested in cheaper models with a locked multiplier, because in their case, the profit from a faster processor will be almost none, because the GPU is the inhibiting factor anyway.

CPU

Compare: Intel Core i5-9600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

A mid-range chip will delight gamers, an area in which Intel’s Core i5-9600K is particularly comfortable. The comparison is often difficult given AMD’s offer in the application area, which is much faster this year.

With the Ryzen 9 3950X, AMD offers a much more comfortable 16-core processor than its predecessors in the Threadripper line. The switch to 7 nm allows it to maintain a high frequency, which, coupled with the Zen 2 architecture, increases performance. A formidable weapon in applications requiring high computing power or a high number of cores is also at home in video games – Intel keeps a short lead in the field. A rather contained power consumption crowns the whole compared to the achieved performances—an excellent processor.

General Info

Intel Core i5-9600KAMD Ryzen 9 3950X
PriceCHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
CPU Modeli5-9600KRyzen 9 3950X
Manufacturing Process14 nm7 nm
Maximum CPU Configuration1S1S
Number of PCIe Lanes16 Lanes24 Lanes
UnlockedYesYes
Weight68.03 g360.60 g

Intel Core i5-9600K

The Core i5-9600K is the most affordable Intel desktop processor built on the Coffee Lake Refresh design. It has only six, not eight computing cores, but it is cheaper than the younger eight-core brother in the face of the Core i7-9700K – by 30% in terms of the official price or more than 40% in terms of the real price.

Even though there is a whole abyss between the Core i5-9600K and the Core i5-8600K in terms of the model number, these processors are quite similar in passport characteristics. Intel did not change any fundamental parameters when converting the Core i5 series to the Coffee Lake Refresh design. The Core i5-9600K, like the Core i5-8600K, remained a six-core without Hyper-Threading support, with L3 cache at the rate of 1.5 MB per core (9 MB in total).

At the same time, the CPU-Z diagnostic utility allows you to make sure that the Core i5-9600K is based on a different semiconductor crystal, a new P0 modification, and not U0, which was used in the previous generation Coffee Lake processors, in which the number of processing cores was no more than six.

This means that internally, the Core i5-9600K is only a distant relative of the Core i5-8600K. The new six-core uses the same eight-core semiconductor crystal as the Core i9-9900K and Core i7-9700K processors, but with a couple of cores blocked during the production phase. And important conclusions follow from this. First, it means that the Core i5-9600K has the first hardware patch against the Meltdown and L1TF (Foreshadow) vulnerabilities. Secondly, the memory controller of this processor is certified to support 128GB DDR4 SDRAM, which will be significant after the upcoming 32GB modules are available on the market.

RELATED:  Intel Core I9-10900k vs Intel Core I9-9900k: Expectations vs Reality

There are also noticeable differences between the Core i5-9600K and the Core i5-8600K in clock speeds. The new six-core has a 100 MHz higher base frequency and a more aggressive turbo mode, allowing it to accelerate to 4.6 GHz under low-threaded load versus 4.3 GHz in its predecessor. The Core i5-9600K promises the best clock speed in turbo mode, even with a full load on all cores. It is installed at 4.3 GHz, while the Core i5-8600K operates at only 4.1 GHz under the same conditions.

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

The new 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X is very similar to the Ryzen 9 3900X. Before us is the second mainstream AMD processor, which is based not on two but on three semiconductor crystals at once, called chiplets in modern terminology. One of these crystals is a universal 12nm IOD chipset, responsible for I / O functions and contains a memory controller, a PCI Express controller, and SoC elements. The other two are 7nm CCD chiplets, which contain eight computational cores. All of this is connected into a single whole through the Infinity Fabric bus, which links each CCD chiplets to the cIOD die.

At the same time, CCDs have no mutual connection, but this does not entail any negative consequences since all the Infinity Fabric logic is located in the I / O chipset, which makes all cores equal in rights. In other words, Ryzen 9 3950X, as opposed to multi-core processorsThreadripper of the last generation, does not have any NUMA nodes and has an absolutely monolithic design from a logical point of view, in which the latencies when working with memory. During mutual data, the exchange is the same for all cores.

In our Ryzen 9 3950X instance, the consumption of the second chipset was not much lower than that of the first. However, the general principle is still clear: the first CCD chipset in the processor is high-frequency, and the second is slower but with reduced energy appetites.

We will not dwell on a detailed analysis of the remaining characteristics of the Ryzen 9 3950X: they are the same as those of the Ryzen 9 3900X. So, the processor has a 64 MB L3 cache, which consists of four 16 MB parts, distributed over four CCX (Core Complex), and also offers 24 PCI Express 4.0 lanes, 16 of which are usually allocated for a video card, 4 for NVMe -store and 4 more – for connection with a set of system logic. All this can be seen in more detail in the CPU-Z screenshot.

Performance

Intel Core i5-9600KAMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Number of Cores6 Cores16 Cores
CPU Threads632
Base Clock Speed3.7 GHz3.5GHz
Maximum Boost Speed4.6 GHz4.7GHz
L3 Cache9MB64MB
CPU SpeedDMI3 (8 GT/s)DMI3 (8 GT/s)
CPU Temperature100°C100°C

Memory Support

Intel Core i5-9600KAMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Maximum Capacity64 GB64 GB
Memory SupportDDR4 2666 MHzDDR4 3200 MHz
ECC MemoryNoNo
Channel ArchitectureDual-ChannelDual-Channel
Maximum Memory Bandwidth41 GB/s47.68 GB/s

Integrated Graphics

Intel Core i5-9600KAMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Graphics ChipsetIntel® UHD Graphics 630
Maximum Resolution Support4096 x [email protected]
Supported APIsOpenGL:4.5
DirectX:12
Output SupporteDP, DisplayPort, HDMI
Number of Displays3

Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-9600KAMD Ryzen 9 3950X
PassMark result (single)27462785
Cinebench R20 (single) result531481
Geekbench 5 result (multi)141745596
Geekbench 5 result (single)12971248

Conclusion!

Intel Core i5-9600K

RELATED:  Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i3-9100F

Against the Core i9-9900K and Core i7-9700K background, the new six-core Core i5-9600K seems somehow completely ordinary and not worthy of close attention. Indeed, it does not offer any changes in the basic characteristics compared to the Core i5-8600K: it is the same processor with six cores without Hyper-Threading support, equipped with a third-level cache memory of 9 MB an unlocked multiplier.

However, the first impression is deceiving. Although the Core i5-9600K cannot please the owners with an increased number of cores in the “up to $ 300” price segment, it surpasses the Core i5-8600K in most parameters. First of all, the six-core novelty of the Coffee Lake Refresh generation has increased clock frequencies, thanks to which, when operating in nominal mode, it can offer a performance advantage of 3-5% in applications and games. Secondly, the Core i5-9600K has a better overclocking potential available out of the box. When using a good cooler, reaching a frequency of about 5 GHz for such a processor does not pose any problem, which cannot say about the Core i5-8600K. And thirdly, in the Core i5-9600K, as in any other representative of the Coffee Lake Refresh family,

Of course, all this is unlikely to induce someone to switch from a Core i5-8600K to a Core i5-9600K; however, when assembling a new system and looking for a suitable Intel processor for it in the range from $ 250 to $ 300, it is logical to focus on the new six-core, and not on his predecessor. Moreover, the overpayment for the Core i5-9600K is only a few dollars if you focus on the official price. By the way, it is fortunate that the Core i5-9600K suffers from undersupply less than other Intel processors. Although it is difficult to believe in it, in the global market, in some places, it is sold even cheaper than the recommended price. In Russia, they offer to pay 1,000 rubles more for the Core i5-9600K than for the Core i5-8600K, but even this can hardly be considered some fundamental overpayment.

Really serious rivals for the Core i5-9600K can become not Intel’s processors of previous generations, but the proposals of AMD. Of course, the Core i5-9600K provides excellent gaming performance, and in this regard, Ryzen 7 and even more so Ryzen 5 as competitors to the six-core Coffee Lake Refresh are untenable. But in demanding computing and creative applications, one can question the superiority of the Core i5-9600K. For workloads, AMD processors at the same price point almost always look more interesting, as they can offer more ramified multithreading in the case of Ryzen 5 or more cores in the case of Ryzen 7.

RELATED:  AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

The new Ryzen 9 3950X has even more challenging rivals. In fact, this is the only product of its kind that balances between desktops and workstations but doesn’t really fall into either category. Sixteen cores for a mass desktop are too much. The Ryzen 9 3950X cannot become a full-fledged HEDT product due to dual-channel memory and an insufficient number of PCI Express lanes, limiting the possibilities of equipping platforms based on it.

Therefore, it is most correct to consider the Ryzen 9 3950X as an experiment and a kind of demonstration of capabilities, in which AMD clearly and convincingly demonstrates all the advantages of its chipset approach. The building blocks of Zen 2 are eight-core 7-nm crystals, and if a couple of them fit inside the Socket AM4 package, then why not take advantage of this – that’s what AMD thought. And then everything turned out by itself: both the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X and the 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X. Of course, in order to make a fully functional three-chip processor that would fit within the 105-watt thermal package, AMD had to work hard and figure out how to organize the selection of suitable crystals. But in the end, a very inventive solution was found for this problem, and now we have to get used to the new reality,

AMD’s skyrocketing increase in desktop processor power is likely to make the Ryzen 9 3950X a bit of a loaf of the trolley in the mainstream. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine that an average user today would be able to appreciate the opportunity to equip a conventional Socket AM4 system with a 16-core CPU, especially considering the complete uselessness of such several cores for gaming applications. But that doesn’t mean the Ryzen 9 3950X has no market prospects. On the contrary, such a price has been chosen for this processor that there will certainly be those among enthusiasts who will be guided by the logic “why not” or even “there aren’t too many cores.” In the end, AMD offers to get twice the number of productive computing cores compared to the Core i9-9900K, overpaying only one and a half times.

In addition, it cannot deny that the Ryzen 9 3950X is really good at handling content that requires serious CPU resources and very good at rendering. In terms of speed in such applications, it can be safely compared with the twice more expensive Core i9-9960X, which until recently was among the flagship processors of the HEDT segment. Now, the Ryzen 9 3950X allows you to get the same on a regular desktop.

Honestly, the Ryzen 9 3950X could have become a much more popular solution if AMD had not promised to introduce the third-generation Ryzen Threadripper in a week. Now, those who really need high-performance and uncompromising multithreading will be targeting the new Socket sTRX4 platform, which, judging by the available data, will set new standards for HEDT systems. All of this further complicates the formulation of specific recommendations for the Ryzen 9 3950X. But if you feel that 8 or 12 cores are too little for you, and 24 and 32 are expensive and generally redundant, then take a closer look at the Ryzen 9 3950X. This processor is clearly worth the money and will certainly not disappoint with its performance.

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

CPU

Intel Core i3-9100 vs Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel is only offering the third reworking of its Skylake architecture released in 2015 (sixth generation Core) with its ninth generation of Core processors. No innovation, consequently, but a growing number of hearts.

Pros and Cons

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
No motherboard change to be expected for a transition
from the 8th to the 9th generation.
No motherboard change to be expected
for a transition from 8th to 9th generation
Integrated graphics circuit: does not require a dedicated
graphics card for office use.
The package includes a CPU Cooler.
Still no architectural evolution.Still no architectural evolution.
Performance in games a little light.Performance in games a little light.

General Info

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
PriceCHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
CPU Modeli3-9100i3-9100F
Manufacturing Process14 nm14 nm
Maximum CPU Configuration1S
Number of PCIe Lanes16 Lanes16 Lanes
UnlockedNoYes
Weight269.88 g263.08 g
Release date

Performance

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
Number of Cores4 Cores4 Cores
CPU Threads44
Base Clock Speed3.6 GHz3.6GHz
Maximum Boost Speed4.2 GHz4.2GHz
L3 Cache6MB6MB
CPU SpeedDMI3 (8 GT/s)DMI3 (8 GT/s)
CPU Temperature100°C100°C

Memory Support

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
Maximum Capacity64 GB64 GB
Memory SupportDDR4 2400 MHzDDR4 2400 MHz
ECC MemoryNoNo
Channel ArchitectureDual-ChannelDual-Channel
Maximum Memory Bandwidth37.5 GB/s37.5 GB/s

Integrated Graphics

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
Graphics ChipsetIntel® UHD Graphics 630
Maximum Resolution Support4096 x [email protected]
Supported APIsOpenGL:4.5
DirectX:12
OpenGl:4.5
DirectX:12
Output SupporteDP, DisplayPort, HDMIeDP, DisplayPort, HDMI

Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-9100Intel Core i3-9100F
PassMark result (single)25462532
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Geekbench 5 result (multi)33283122
Geekbench 5 result (single)10691027

Conclusion!

Intel Core i3-9100

RELATED:  AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: Gaming Processor

The Core i3-9100 represents an interesting entry-level solution to equip an office automation machine. We will not ask too much because its application performance is far from exceptional, but we appreciate the iGPU which, if it is not intended for video games, allows you to do away with the purchase of a graphics card. dedicated.

Intel Core i3-9100F

First prize in terms of the ninth-generation Core processor, the i3-9100F offers satisfactory performance for office use. Devoid of integrated graphics circuit, it requires purchasing a dedicated graphics card and directly attacks chips like the AMD Ryzen 3 3100, whose performance, regardless of the price, is superior in every way.

Continue Reading

CPU

Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-11600K

Today we will introduce you to two new processors from Intel, two from the K range with overclocking capabilities through processor unlock for overclocking completely configurable by the user, but they are also the most powerful processors that we can buy within the new range of Core i5 processors and Intel’s 11th Gen Core i9.

The Core i5-11600k that inherits the price range and basic features of the Core i5-10600k has been one of the best processors for gamers in recent months, although less than a year ago. its launch to the market.

It is a processor with the same cores, six, and the same threads, twelve, and the same 125w TDP, but there are changes in its architecture that make it a faster processor, around 20% of IPC according to Intel, and with really important connective improvements that put Intel in the new generation of PCI Express 4.0 components.

Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel’s top-of-the-line has had a hard time over the last year, first defending itself against the Ryzen 3000 and then the Ryzen 5000 with major improvements in their performance per cycle thanks to the introduction of AMD’s Zen3 architecture. Now Intel responds with a processor, the Core i9-11900K in this review, which still takes advantage of a 14nm manufacturing process, but with significant performance improvements per cycle, but curiously with loss of cores compared to the same model of the previous generation.

This is a bit difficult to understand but it seems that Intel’s goal, at least even depending on this manufacturing process, is not to compete with AMD in the number of cores in this domestic LGA1200 socket range but it seems that the goal is to take advantage of everything. possible in TDP of these processors to achieve higher stable working frequencies that translate into higher overall performance that can compete with and outperform the best AMD options currently on the market. 

Today’s review will be dedicated exclusively to analyzing Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i9-11900K.

Pros and Cons

i5-11600Ki9-11900K
A major performance improvement per cycleExcellent performance improvement per cycle
Finally PCI Express 4.0 in Intel’s mid-rangeUnbeatable gaming performance
Good turbo frequency management with your own means
Low overclocking capability at temperatures above ambientWe lose two cores, although we will hardly miss them.
It requires new motherboards to develop its PCI Express 4.0 capability.
A processor that requires a good ventilation system

General Info

i5-11600Ki9-11900K
$CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
CPU ModelBX8070811600KBX8070811900K
Manufacturing Process14 nm14 nm
Maximum CPU Configuration1S1S
Number of PCIe Lanes20 (Revision 4.0)20 (Revision 4.0)
UnlockedYesYes
Release dateMarch 2021March 2021

i5-11600K

Unlike the previous generation, these new next-generation models use a power and connectivity system similar to the previous ones, which has allowed Intel to maintain compatibility with the LGA1200 socket and these processors can be mounted both on current motherboards (with Z490 or H470 chipset) with fourth-generation chipsets such as the new fifth-generation chipsets that also introduce interesting connective improvements for users of these new processors.

Among the new chipsets, we can find the new Z590 and H560, as well as other lower-end ones such as the B560, and all of them will be necessary if we want to have a PCI Express signal for the rest of our components. If you keep the old chipset you will not have this connective capacity and you will have to stick to PCI Express 3.0 speeds even though the processor can provide more bandwidth.

The only chipset that maintains all the capabilities of the processor, such as the configurable internal multiplier, is still the Z variant, although now in the H and B series we will also have memory overclocking capacity, up to more than 4GHz according to Intel, which is something that newer processors can do even dynamically.

The new Intel Z590 chipset has interesting improvements over the Z490, but perhaps less than we might expect. For example, it is still a PCI Express 3.0 chipset, with 24 lines like the Z490, but adds other improvements such as USB connectivity that now allows you to have 3 USB 3.2 Gen2 2×2 ports of 20Gbps of bandwidth.

The chipset maintains the 8x DMI 3.0 bus (8GTs of bandwidth towards the processor) for communication with the processor, it also maintains integration support for CNVi and 2.5GbE and Wifi-6E LAN networks with chipsets as powerful as the new one. Intel Wifi-AX210 triple band. It also maintains the same support for six SATA connectors with RAID modes, the 10 USB 3.1 Gen2 2×1 10Gbps ports, the 10 USB 3.2 Gen1 5Gbps ports and the 14 USB 2.0 type ports. The TDP also remains at 6 watts allowing Intel to continue to maintain fully passive support for its high-end chipsets for these home processors.

i9-11900K

RELATED:  Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i9-11900K

These processors feature 2  direct-controlled PCI Express 4.0 lanes and a revamped memory controller that now supports higher overclocking frequencies as well as real-time dynamic frequency adjustments. This will also now be accessible in mid-range chipsets such as the H570 and the B560, which make their debut in RAM memory overclocking.

The new chipsets, however, do not differ greatly from the previous generation. We continue with 24 PCI Express 3.0 lanes or the 8x DMI 3.0 bus that produces 8GTs of bandwidth to the processor. However, it lays the foundations for superior peripheral connectivity by adding 3 USB 3.2 Gen2 2×2 ports of 20Gbps of bandwidth and also supporting other technologies such as Thunderbolt 4.0 or USB 4.0.

Another thing that remains the same is the integration support for CNVi and 2.5GbE and Wifi-6E LAN networks with chipsets as powerful as the new Intel Wifi-AX210 triple band. It also maintains the same support for six SATA connectors with RAID modes, the 10 USB 3.1 Gen2 2×1 10Gbps ports, the 10 USB 3.2 Gen1 5Gbps ports and the 14 USB 2.0 type ports. The TDP also remains at 6 watts allowing Intel to continue to maintain fully passive support for its high-end chipsets for these home processors.

This processor that we tested today can be mounted on your Z490 motherboard without the slightest problem, the only important deficiency will be found at the level that you will not be able to take advantage of the full potential of the new generations of graphics and storage units with PCI Express 4.0 interface.

Performance

i5-11600Ki9-11900K
Number of Cores6 Cores8 Cores
CPU Threads1216
CPU Clock Rate3900MHz3500MHz
Maximum Boost Speed1.3 GHz1.3 GHz
L3 Cache12 MB16MB
CPU Turbo Clock Rate4900MHz5300MHz

i5-11600K

RELATED:  Compare: Intel Core i5-9600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel has already been in 14nm for so many generations that I have already lost count. This means that these processors are not going to bring us great improvements in frequencies or in overclocking capacity and they are still processors at the limit of their capacities with high working temperatures if we do not place the appropriate means to contain them.

The Core i5s are still the little brothers of the range and do not have access to the more elaborate turbo modes that we can find, for example, in the i9 range that enjoys Turbo Boost 3.0 modes and also TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost) technology. that allows the Core i9 to increase its frequency to 5.3GHz if the thermal situation of the processor and its load allow it.

Apart from this, they do keep all the rest of the great extended features of this generation. We can find, for example, compatibility with the new AI coprocessors integrated in this generation, they also have Hyperthreading technology, support for DDR4 memory overclocking, next-generation graphics based on Intel’s Xe architecture, the new QuickSync Video modes with support. for HDR and ultra high definition in high quality formats such as HEVC / VP9.

But as for the changes between generations, entering the pure and hard data, the most important change between generations will be found in the support for the PCI Express 4.0 interface . These new processors not only double the connective capacity by means of this standard, but also go from 16 lines supported by the processor to a total of 20, which allows to have a graphic in 16x mode and a fully supported 4x high-speed storage unit. by the processor itself regardless of the capabilities of the chipset.

Another important difference, which is not so much in models like these that are intended to be accompanied by a dedicated graphic (if you can get hold of a moderately modern one), is the integrated graphics card that improves substantially with support for Vulkan in its latest versions and also DirectX 12.1 with up to 32 processing units and support also for OpenCL 3.0.

After these important changes, and the extensions for AI and Deeplearning introduced in this generation, in the real day to day the differences are blurred. Both the Core i5-10600k and the Core i5-11600k have 6 cores with 12 threads and the same TDP configurable between 95 and 125w.

The frequency differences are also minimal with a base frequency of 4.1GHz on the Core i5-10600k and 3.9GHz on the new Core i5-11600k. The turbo frequencies do fall on the side of the new one with a maximum of 4.9GHz compared to the 4.8GHz of the Core i5-10600k. Both also support a maximum of 128GB of RAM, but the new one does so with faster memories of 3200MHz, compared to 2933MHz of the previous one, and with real-time overclocking modes that allow you to adjust the memory frequency according to the needs and load of the system in real time.

i9-11900K

RELATED:  AMD Ryzen TR 2920X vs Intel Core i9-9900K

The Core i5-11600k the differences between the new and the previous model were clear and were mainly in the improvements of performance per cycle (IPC) and in the connective capacity. The same number of cores, identical TDP, very similar working frequencies, sister processors to which big changes differ, but not in the main numbers that we are used to quickly measure if one processor is faster than another.

With the Core i9-11900k we find ourselves in a somewhat different situation. Both are the highest-end models of their generation, they have similar frequencies and the same TDP. The changes between generation are also the same, with more PCI Express lanes, and now twice as fast, with new more capable and modern graphics and with new Deep Learning and AI capabilities integrated into the processor.

They even have similar operating frequencies and the same turbo features available that include Intel’s Turbo Boost 3.0 technology in addition to TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost) technology that makes both models have a maximum turbo speed, for a few cores. , up to 5.3GHz .

But there is a big difference between these two generations and that is that the tenth generation, the Core i9-10900k has 10 cores and 20 processing threads and Intel has decided to maintain a maximum configuration of 8 cores and 16 processing threads for this generation. With this drop in cores, we also lose 4MB of third-level cache, going from 20MB to 16MB.

On paper, in applications capable of taking advantage of this parallel processing capacity, with a simple rule of three and applying the promised 20% improvement in IPC, we are facing two processors with very similar performance in this type of application.

Memory Support

i5-11600Ki9-11900K
Maximum Capacity128 GB128 GB
PCIe version4.04.0
ECC MemoryNoNo
Channel ArchitectureDual-ChannelDual-Channel
Maximum Memory Bandwidth50 GB/s50 GB/s

Integrated Graphics

i5-11600Ki9-11900K
Graphics ChipsetIntel UHD Graphics 750Intel UHD Graphics 750
Maximum Resolution Support5120 x 3200 at 60 Hz5120 x 3200 at 60 Hz
Supported APIsDirectX: 12
OpenGL: 4.6
DirectX: 12
OpenGL: 4.5
Output SupportDisplayPort, HDMIDisplayPort, HDMI
Number of Displays22

Conclusion!

i5-11600K

Intel has improved a lot, and without the need to change the manufacturing process. This generation adds many new features, some highly anticipated such as PCI Express 4.0, and it does it in the right way.

Their prices should be better, the performance leap between AMD and Intel has been completely reduced to practically nothing, although it depends on the benchmark we use, and AMD currently has a serious problem of availability of its microphones, perhaps now it will be solved because it is clear that in the medium term they will lose sales in favor of Intel unless they have a price adjustment plan or the introduction of new models in the short term.

Be that as it may, Intel now has a Core i5-11600k that is really competitive and that once again encourages the market for home-range processors. This brings benefits for the user and we are sure that we are also beginning to see cheaper PCI Express 4.0 storage units thanks to a higher demand since now both AMD and Intel support this technology in the domestic market. I invite you to also read our review of Intel’s new high-end, the powerful Core i9-11900K .

i9-11900K

The Core i9-11900k is a strange processor because the trend is not to go to fewer cores but quite the opposite, although it is also true that the escalation of cores right now has suffered a small stop where manufacturers take advantage of again to try to increase performance per clock cycle.

This architecture has an important improvement in this sense and it is seen in the results, but it also loses two cores that are also felt in applications that are capable of taking advantage of them. If we are going to play then this is an important improvement, if not to think about changing one processor for the other. Be that as it may, Intel has a great processor here for gamers, without a doubt.

The improvement in PCI Express 4.0 connectivity also opens up a new range of high-performance storage units and also provides compatibility with the most modern graphics on the market, if we can get one at a reasonable price. Intel finally has these features, and other important improvements, that do make this generation a much more profound change than in the previous two.

Continue Reading

More Topics

AUDIO2 days ago

SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL vs Steelseries Apex 3: Which is Better Keyboard

SteelSeries is a brand that knows how to make powerful, affordable and simple devices. The SteelSeries Apex 3 keyboard is the perfect example...

AUDIO4 days ago

Huawei FreeBuds Studio vs AKG K245: Headphone Comparison

Huawei FreeBuds Studio is a full-size wireless active noise-canceling headphones. The first model in this segment is from Huawei. Claimed:...

LAPTOPS1 week ago

2021 Newest Dell XPS 15 OLED 9510 Laptop Review

Do not be fooled by its unchanged design; each year, Dell takes advantage of the arrival of a new generation...

AUDIO1 week ago

Ugreen HiTune T2 vs Ugreen HiTune True: Wireless Earbuds Comparision

Anyone who hears Ugreen will primarily think of charging cables and power banks. But the Chinese manufacturer has also expanded...

AUDIO1 week ago

Technics EAH-AZ60 vs Technics EAH-AZ70W: Dual Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones

The Technics AZ70 True Wireless headphones from the high fidelity range from 200$. The selection here is very small, the...

AUDIO1 week ago

Jabra Elite 7 Pro Vs Jabra Elite 7 Active: Which TWS Should You Buy

The Danish manufacturer Jabra was, alongside Apple, one of the first providers of TWS (True Wireless Stereo) headphones. This refers...

MOUSE2 weeks ago

Logitech G Pro X Superlight vs Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless: Gaming Mouse Comparision

At the beginning of 2021, G Pro X Superlight will be competing for the crown at the highest level with Razer’s...

LAPTOPS2 weeks ago

Acer Aspire Vero Intel Core i5 Laptop Review

The manufacture of a computer is often relatively energy-intensive. The materials used are often aluminum, magnesium, something solid certainly, but...

LAPTOPS2 weeks ago

MSI GP76 Leopard Gaming Laptop With RTX 3070 Review

Having a PC to play is, in my opinion, the best gaming option. Nevertheless, buying a tower requires space; shortages...

AUDIO2 weeks ago

AfterShokz Aeropex vs AfterShokz Trekz Air: Wireless Bone Conduction Headphones

Aftershokz is a brand that was founded in 2011 and has been selling boneconducting headphones for several years. For me,...

AUDIO2 weeks ago

Bowers & Wilkins PX7 vs Bowers & Wilkins PX5: Active Noise Cancelling Headset Review

The Bowers and Wilkins PX7  visually, it resembles the slightly smaller PX5, and technically it is very similar technology. Even...

AUDIO2 weeks ago

Sendy Audio Aiva Magnetic vs AKG K371 Closed-Back Headphones Review

Sendy Audio, a newcomer is entering the market for high-quality headphones. The first product from the Chinese, is now also...

Trending