Sendy Audio, a newcomer is entering the market for high-quality headphones. The first product from the Chinese, is now also available in USA- at an attractive price.
Sendy Audio is a sub-brand of Dongguan Sivga Electronic Technology. As the company is called in short, Sivga was founded in 2016 by a small group of Chinese audio enthusiasts. Whether on the go or at home: listening to music through headphones is very important in China. The setup of amplifier and handset can cost a little and is qualitatively representative in the best case. The market for exquisite headphones is correspondingly large.
Sivga managed the western market under the Sendy Audio label and launched the Aiva, which caused quite a stir in the community at CamJam 2019. The Sendy audio headphones have been available directly in Switzerland since this spring, thanks to the distributor, Portacomp. A fitting time for us to take a closer look at the newcomer from China.
The new K371 is the successor to the closed studio classic from AKG just because of its number – or is there more to it?
The AKG K371 is good, with three cables included: a short 1.2 m model, a straight 3 m connector, and a 3 m spiral cable. The K271 they are all connected to the headphones via mini XLR and has a 3.5 mm jack with a 6.35 mm adapter at the other end. The listener feels right in any environment, be it home, in a studio, or on the mobile player on the way through the city.
The earphones can be pulled out on both sides and adjusted to the head size, and screwed into the headband so that they take up less space. The mechanism makes a stable impression.
Overall, the K371 makes a high-quality impression on me; although there is a lot of plastic involved, the crucial areas are reinforced with metal, and it has an enjoyable soft-touch surface. The design fluctuates between the “professional look” due to the subtle appearance in color and material and the “stylish model” due to the small, close-fitting shape with oval shells. I think it’s a success.
|Sendy Audio Aiva||AKG K371|
|Good dynamics||Excellent sound quality|
|Comfortable to wear||Nice design with decent isolation|
|Excellent design||Balanced and neutral sound profile|
|Limited soundstage size||Sound leaks|
|Sendy Audio Aiva||AKG K371|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Weight||425 g||255 g|
|Dimension||10.9 x 9.8 x 5.8 inches||3 x 3 x 3 inches|
|Driver||Magnetostat||50 mm dynamic|
|Frequency Response||20Hz – 40kHz||5 – 40000 Hz|
|Impedance||32 ohms||32 ohms|
Everything seems perfect and lovingly thought out down to the last detail – from the cardboard box to the linen bag for the cables. The package also includes a black synthetic leather box for storage, which is perfectly adapted to the shape of the Aiva.
The Sendy Audio Aiva is the production of the earpiece, which, according to the company, is handcrafted. They refer to unspecified traditional craft production techniques and choose the high-quality solid Zebrano wood as the housing material.
They are proud that the earpiece is made using woodcut technology, and great importance is attached to the manual and unique production. The production of headphones is understood as craftsmanship. Therefore, it is more “European” than some manufacturers from the old continent who produce carelessly at Foxconn and increasingly dilute their heritage and expertise in production technology.
As mentioned, the basis for the earpiece is Zebrano wood, heavy wood with strength properties that are higher than those of oak. The entire production process from cutting, carving, polishing to repeated drying is arduous and, according to the company, requires a lot of manpower and time.
The result can be seen. Each Aiva is a feast for the eyes and unique in the color and texture of the wooden earpiece. The outside of the acoustically open earpiece is covered by a delicate perforated plate and an overlaid black metal grille in a fishtail design. The look is fascinating.
The carrying handle of anodized metal, complemented by a leather headband, contributes to its highly noble appearance. The position of the headband can be varied slightly. To fix it permanently to the mounting bracket, you need a small hexagon socket.
The support bracket merges into the driver forks via a CND milled end piece. These move around 30 degrees freely on the axis to adapt to the shape of the head. The earpads are edged with a high-quality suede. To ensure that the listener is comfortable, the ear pads have an asymmetrical shape. The velvet padding encloses the ear with even pressure so that it rests ergonomically on the scalp.
The AKG K371 is a classic closed headphone with dynamic drivers. The impedance is pleasantly low at 32 ohms, and the efficiency is very high so that it is also a lot of fun on mobile devices and achieves sufficient volume.
The insulation is provided by oval ear cushions made of synthetic leather, which nestle very gently against the head and offer enough space even for prominent ears. The depth of the auricles is excellent, and you can wear the headphones for hours without irritation. Of course, ambient noise continues to reach the ear at a muffled level, but the K371 offers excellent attenuation, especially in the high-frequency range. This area is usually annoying with background noise – the AKG K371 attenuates significantly better than the K271, despite its smaller design.
In the earpiece, a 97 x 76 mm double-sided magnetostat works as a sound transducer. For those who are not familiar with the technology of magnetostat, a brief overview:
In a dynamic sound transducer found in 95% of all headphones, a stiff membrane is set in a piston movement in the center by a glued-on current-flowing voice coil to generate sound. In the case of a magnetostat, the conductor and membrane are identical. A thin and highly light plastic film is clamped between two strong magnets. A meandering metal strip is vapor-deposited onto this membrane.
Structure of the Aiva sound transducer. In the middle is the foil with a vapor-deposited conductor track. It is surrounded on both sides by large fixed magnets.
The metal strip of the foil, the membrane is moved to the rhythm of the changing magnetic forces. Thus, the sound is generated. Hence the name «magnetostat». A large membrane area is required for depth in the bass range. Nevertheless, the magnetostat have a low-mass and, therefore, much lighter diaphragm than conventional dynamic transducers with their voice coil.
Together with the uniform excitation over the entire membrane surface, the result is a significantly better satisfactory resolution with fewer artifacts in the form of overshoots than with dynamic transducers. Sound is generated on the front and the back. When it comes to loudspeakers, the required size quickly becomes a problem. However, magnetos are perfect for headphones.
If you have plugged in the cable of your choice and connected it to the music source, the AKG K371 will surprise you. First of all, there is an apparent voice reproduction in connection with a very present bass range. Voices and rhythm are separated, and both receive their presence.
You hear the tracks over and recognize something new repeatedly without being uncomfortable to see the “individual parts” of the songs so clearly. As if it had been deliberately tuned to sound pleasant. And in the end, it is – with a system. This behavior becomes more precise if you take a closer look at the philosophy of the AKG listener. It follows the so-called “Harman frequency curve.”
Headphones can pursue different goals: bring the sound to the ear as unchanged as possible, as it is on the recording, or offer a representation that comes close to the hearing impression of loudspeakers in living rooms. As an ideal, the former has a completely linear frequency response. Then every tone comes to the ear as it is immortalized on the sound carrier (theoretically).
The Harman curve, which the AKG K371 follows, is based on the sound impression of a stereo system in an acoustically well-damped room. This target curve follows the theory and underpins it with data from a survey of many listeners with different hearing experiences and tastes.
Sendy Audio Aiva- At 420 grams, the Sendy Audio Aiva is not lightweight. The heavy magnets of the transducer are responsible for the weight. Nevertheless, it is comfortable to wear. The ear cushions close perfectly. The headband and padding feel pleasantly soft and soft. After a short time, you can hardly notice it. With long-term listening, it does not tend to cause “hot ears”. I was therefore happy to use it for editing audio production on the PC. The only downer: Unfortunately, the bracket cannot be adjusted horizontally. For people with a small head, it can get tight with the contact pressure.
With an impedance of 32 ohms and 96 dB efficiency – both according to the datasheet – it shouldn’t make any great demands on the amplifier’s performance. Nevertheless, I would recommend using a good headphone amplifier to operate the Aiva. The reproduction then gains in transparency and freshness. It harmonizes perfectly with the portable iFi Hip DAC. The fact that the Apollo Quad converter struggled to provide the Aiva with power does not give the expensive professional device an excellent report. However, it shows by way of example that magnetostat must be supplied with sufficient electricity.
The tonal balance shows a subtle tendency towards the loudness effect. This means that the upper mids are slightly reduced in the area where our hearing is most sensitive. An approach that makes sense with headphones, where the sound is triggered directly at the ear. Together with the slightly accentuated fundamental range, the result is a wonderfully velvety and pleasantly unobtrusive sound balance that does not tire even after hours of listening.
Sensitive listeners will enjoy the nerve-saving vote. But the Aiva doesn’t sound musty. On the contrary: with the typical lightness of a magnetostat, it shines with a high resolution and opens up the space for a deep acoustic view.
The Aiva always sounds warm and resonant, with physical lower mids and – at least for my taste – extremely harmonious voice reproduction.
The impulse reproduction, which I would describe as precise, more than sufficiently dynamic, and free of artifacts, is less convincing. The Aiva certainly benefits from its open design. Where there is no compression pressure through a housing, there can be ease.
Compared to the well-known celebrities from Sennheiser, the Sendy Audio Aiva is undoubtedly more reserved in the presence area, almost more distant in terms of voice reproduction and with a subtly accentuated bass.
The Sendy Audio Aiva has an organically tempered sound character that you would hardly want to miss. The sound timbre looks highly natural and doesn’t sound like plastic at all.
AKG K371- Whether beautiful or not, what works with the K371 is the reliable assessment of the source material. The way it is presented, the AKG most likely reminds me of slightly warm monitor speakers set up in a typical near-field configuration. These clearly show all the details, but the reproduction is never so sharp that it could be uncomfortable. The AKG K371 can therefore be used excellently as monitor headphones.
It manages the difficult balancing act between listening pleasure and analytical reproduction and can therefore be used to fathom the differences between hi-fi components. Like other honest headphones, the AKG also clearly shows errors in the recording. It never becomes “unfair” and does not particularly emphasize them, but even if the details are relatively small, they are noticeable due to their accuracy.
The resolution is on a very high level and stands out positively, but it does not come close to the level of listeners in higher price ranges such as an AKG K812 or Sennheiser HD800. A similarly priced Sennheiser H599 (open design) resolves details similarly well but offers a somewhat more relaxed reproduction. With the Sennheiser, you have to actively pay attention to the details in the mix to perceive differences; they are less present than with the AKG K371. While the AKG is a precision tool, the Sennheiser is a familiar piece of upholstered furniture: comfortable and without corners or edges.
Spatially, the closed AKG does not work miracles. The stage impression is somewhat less pronounced so that it sounds like all notes come from the same depth. The K371 is therefore not predestined for significant orchestral works. Here he shows all the sound details of the recording, but a coherent music ensemble doesn’t want to build up in front of my inner eye.
What makes the AKG stand out positively is the deep bass reproduction. At first, you don’t trust such a compact and light listener to have such enormous depth, but the 50 mm drivers enable an astonishingly powerful deep bass that never gets out of control. Here the AKG grows beyond itself. In particular, he does not try to compensate for the lack of deep bass with more volume in higher bass registers – he does not need that at all.
The high-frequency range is “unspectacularly good.” The K371 never rattle, but the heights can be pretty sharp if the recording allows it. Classical instruments such as the violin also come to life at the AKG but always remain natural.
With a price of 760 USD, the Sendy Audio Aiva Magnetostat is a hit. It is a headphone for those who enjoy a soft sound that is restrained in the mids. With its ease of showing nuanced playing styles and timbres, it ensures a lot of listening pleasure. In terms of sound, it plays at least one class above its price range. The wearing comfort and the high processing quality round off the successful overall picture.
The K371, AKG has created an inspiring model for a vast target audience. The headphones can be used for critical studio work and relaxing music or gaming sessions in the evening. Thanks to its high level of comfort, compact design, and outstanding efficiency, it is also an excellent choice for headphone enthusiasts with high sound demands on the go.
With its robust and honest deep bass range, paired with a slight warmth in the middle, it can be heard relaxed for hours. At the same time, it achieves an excellent representation of details without the heights ever becoming shrill and allows you to perceive all the nuances of the recording. The spatial representation, which turns out to be relatively compact, is a minor weakness. The overall package that AKG has put together for the money is outstanding and, therefore, a clear recommendation for balanced and honest sound images fans.
SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL vs Steelseries Apex 3: Which is Better Keyboard
SteelSeries is a brand that knows how to make powerful, affordable and simple devices. The SteelSeries Apex 3 keyboard is the perfect example of the know-how of the Danish brand, a keyboard, simple but effective at a more than affordable price.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 is an entry-level gaming keyboard that combines good build quality with an affordable price for a keyboard. It belongs to the brand’s Glow Up range: “Superior quality products at an affordable price offering the cutting-edge innovation and high-end performance of SteelSeries”. What is it worth?
Let’s compare the SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL vs Steelseries Apex 3 in our full review of the new SteelSeries keyboard.
|SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL||SteelSeries Apex 3|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Released||October 12, 2021||January 15, 2020|
|Dimensions||5.94 x 17.52 x 1.57 inches||5.94 x 17.52 x 1.57 inches|
|Size||TenKeyLess (80%)||Full-size (100%)|
|Weight||1.41 lbs (0.640 kg)||1.76 lbs (0.800 kg)|
|Latency Wired||10.6 ms||10.7 ms|
|Key Lifespan||20 million keystrokes||20 million keystrokes|
|Battery||No Batteries||No Batteries|
|Compatibility||macOS, Windows||macOS, Windows|
|Software||SteelSeries GG||Steelseries Engine|
In terms of design, this Apex 3 TKL is the same as the classic apex 3, without the numeric keypad hence its name TKL. The keyboard is simple, black without any particular frills. We only see three logos on the entire keyboard.
On the front of the keyboard, you will find the SteelSeries logo in grey on black, very discreet; we hardly notice it. Just above, you will have your keyboard as such, or the keys are square and come out with their backlight.
On the right of the keyboard, there are the directional switches on top of the Windows action switches, the play/pause button, and the sound adjustment dial, nothing special. Still, more than enough in itself, this is quite the purpose of this SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL keyboard.
The keyboard is made of ABS plastic, with a pleasant touch that leaves no fingerprints; on the other hand, it takes dust very quickly, so it will have to be cleaned often if you do not like a dirty keyboard like me. As usual at SteelSeries, the quality is good; being accustomed to their products is always a pleasure in terms of design and manufacture quality.
The backlight of this keyboard is very simple, quite effective even if it slightly lacks brightness through the keys; the distribution of light in the characters is quite uneven, but in itself nothing serious it remains pretty and practical without being in them too much.
On the underside of the keyboard, you will find five buffers, two of which are used to adjust the tilt of the keyboard, but also the passage of the keyboard cable that allows you to pass it in the centre, left or right.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 keyboard is built in a way that is inspired by high-end keyboards. Indeed, the device tastes like a polymer chassis of superior quality. Although “polymer” only means plastic, it doesn’t make a difference to use with the aluminum alloy found on the SteelSeries Apex 7, the high-end keyboard of the Apex series. The keyboard can be raised using two triggers positioned below the keyboard.
About the bottom, it is marked with a sheath that guides the cable either to the left, middle, or right of the keyboard to avoid having to endure that its cable drags where you do not want it.
The keyboard, of course, offers two small winders to adjust the angle at which you want your keyboard to be more of an optimal keystroke. Five non-slip surfaces are placed on the back of the keyboard to ensure its stability.
On the other side, facing the user is a plate composed of 105 keys that sport the keyboard and form an AZERTY layout. An FN key hidden under a keycap of the SteelSeries logo allows activating more functions, such as disabling the Windows key in the game. But this function key also enables you to lower or increase the brightness and change the backlight animations.
At the top right are the logo of the brand and four LEDs that allow you to know if you have activated the Caps lock, scroll lock, num lock, or the lock of the Windows key in-game. Still on the part at the top right is positioned a wheel to adjust the volume. Present on a good part of the brand’s keyboards. It is handy when you get used to it. Next to this wheel is positioned a button with a horizontal bar. This is used to pause or move on to the next music.
The little plus of this keyboard is that it is certified by the IP32 standard, guaranteeing its increased resistance to damage caused by possible spills of liquids on the keyboard.
SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL is not a mechanical keyboard, but the switches are comfortable and quieter than many gaming keyboards.
The typing feedback of the keyboard keys is excellent, the keyboard responds well, and the layout of the keys is well done, quite classic, but effective in itself.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL keyboard is mounted with Whisper-quiet Gaming switches with a durability of 20 million keystrokes which is not bad. Before seeing it at the end of its life, writing a lord of the rings trilogy will be necessary.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 is close to a high-end keyboard even in terms of comfort. The keyboard comes with magnetic plastic wrist rest in the box. The latter leaves the user with increased comfort since he has support to rest his wrists.
The switches of this keyboard are not mechanical as on more high-end keyboards, but membrane. These membrane switches are less pleasant but for all that is widely used in any case, whether typing or gaming. But, membranes have disadvantages; they allow water resistance and silent typing, which changes us from the noise that mechanical keyboards make.+
Because switches or switches are membranes- keycaps are also different from those found on a mechanical keyboard. A hole replaces the usual cross. It will, therefore, not be possible to buy third-party keycaps and install them on the keyboard. However, the latter are comfortable and legible and therefore have no reason to be interchanged.
The keyboard is backlit in a relatively sober way. Thanks to the SteelSeries Engine software, everything is configured and allows a reasonably advanced configuration with three lighting designs with the colors you want.
- Multicolored breathing
The configuration of the colors can be done by sharing the eight parts defined on the keyboard in fixed parameters; it is quite well done.
Note that it is also possible to adjust the brightness directly from the keyboard using the F11 and F12 keys by pressing SteelSeries S key on the keyboard, which works as an FN key.
This is in itself quite limited, but it remains in line with the simplicity of the keyboard, no complex configuration, it is simple and effective and, in my opinion, perfectly functional and sufficient for this keyboard.
The backlight of this keyboard is spread over 10 vertical areas. Unlike the Apex 7, the Apex 3 does not have one diode per key, but 10 independently configurable zones. Indeed, mechanical switches with RGB LEDs cost much more and would drastically increase the price of the keyboard. This zone lighting is, however, not without usefulness: it illuminates between the keys. It does not just illuminate the top of keycaps as on most mechanical keyboards with RGB backlight.
However, the backlight of this keyboard remains powerful and largely satisfactory for the range in which it is located.
SteelSeries Engine Software
SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL– To configure your keyboard and all the brand’s peripherals, install the straightforward and well-designed SteelSeries Engine software. This will allow you to configure the different shortcuts of your choice.
You will be able to record Macro commands according to your needs directly from the keyboard shortcuts option once the keyboard is selected in the software.
In addition, you can adjust the language configuration of your keyboard from its settings in addition to shortcuts and backlight. They are effortless and have more than enough options for this keyboard; they make coffee perfectly for basic gaming and productivity.
SteelSeries Apex 3- The Engine 3 software allows you to configure the RGB backlight with a gallery of effects: fixed, ColorShift, Multicolor breathing, and off. The colors can be customized either zone by area by the color checkerboard located on the right of the window and by a color selector that leaves the user the choice of his favorite color. However, it should still be taken with tweezers because the colors indicated on the software are not the same as those displayed by the keyboard.
The keyboard is compatible with PrismSync. This feature makes it possible to synchronize RGB lighting between the devices of the brand. It becomes possible to have the same effect between your motherboard, screen, headset, mat, mouse, and even your keyboard. In particular, the feature works on the Apex 3 and Rival 2 combo, the entry-level keyboard, and the mouse from SteelSeries. The two devices that are members of the Glow Up series thus enter the Steelseries ecosystem and adapt very well.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL keyboard is good, basic sober, and quality to cover most of everyone’s needs without being too much.
The SteelSeries Apex 3 is a membrane RGB gaming keyboard. With a good build quality and excellent software, it is a good choice for gamers wanting to enter the Steelseries universe.
Huawei FreeBuds Studio vs AKG K245: Headphone Comparison
Huawei FreeBuds Studio is a full-size wireless active noise-canceling headphones. The first model in this segment is from Huawei. Claimed: high-quality (intelligent) noise reduction, excellent sound, and good voice transmission—technological and stylish model. In the comparision, we’ll see if it can compete with the leaders in the ANC headphone segment. For the price – a competitor. Let’s see if it is justified.
The AKG K245 are dynamic headphones, circumaural and open, with two moving coil drivers with 50-millimeter diaphragms. It is foldable but does not do without the headband system for a comfortable fit and automatic size adjustment, for which AKG continues to earn a lot of praise.
Pros and Cons
|Huawei FreeBuds Studio||AKG K245|
|High quality sound||Detailed sound|
|Comfortable fit||High wearing comfort|
|Solid battery life||Controlled bass|
|Decent ANC||Inhibited high mids / highs|
|No wired connection option||Earcups may be small for larger ears|
|Non-folding design||Sound stage restricted for open-back|
|Huawei FreeBuds Studio||AKG K245|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Released||January 11, 2021||Jul 16, 2019|
|Dimension||194 x 152 x 81.5 mm||220 x 109 x 234.95 mm|
|Weight||260 g||295 g|
|Frequency Response||4 Hz to 48 kHz||15 Hz to 25 kHz|
|Sensitivity||–||109 DB @ 1 kHz|
|Driver||40 mm||50 mm|
|Impedance||32 Ohms||32 Ohms|
|Audio Connector||Wireless||3.5 mm|
|Cable Length||1.2 m||3 m|
|Battery Life||24 hrs||–|
HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio looks not only beautiful but stylish and, most importantly, original. They will be recognizable. The body is made of plastic, supplemented with artificial leather, and only the hinges are made of metal. On the other hand, it lightens the weight of the headphones. Plastic is not cheap; it looks sophisticated and is very pleasant to the touch. And the build quality is also pleasing since there are no squeaks; the case is durable and does not lend itself to deformation when pressed. You can choose from two color options – black and gold. Both versions look decent. HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio Black – a more restrained version, classic. Gold is soft and sophisticated. The headband around the entire perimeter is softened with leatherette; since it is huge, the headphones look solid. The bowls themselves have a minimum of decor. These are just two-stage bowls, each with a logo on them.
The buttons are made in the same color as the entire body. The absence of other colors and intricate details makes the model even more attractive. The hinges also fit into the overall concept as they are made to match the body color. They turn easily. The ear cushions are super soft, making the HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio headphones comfortable. Material – artificial leather.
The cups are hardly noticeable on the ears. As much as possible in principle. Thanks to the ability to adjust the position of the cups (the hinges can be pulled out by about 4 cm on each side), the headphones are suitable for people with different head sizes.
AKG K245 are closed-back headphones ideal for recording, mixing, and listening. AKG K245 is equipped with two powerful 50mm diaphragms, which provide clear sound with a special low-frequency response and wide stereo panorama.
A recognition feature of AKG studio headphones for years: the elastic, self-adjusting headband automatically adapts to the anatomy of the head. A manual fork extension is unnecessary. The slim, striking and contemporary and timeless design.
These headphones can play music at high volume on mobile players (smartphones) and USB audio interfaces due to the low impedance of 32 ohms. Soft, comfortable ear cushions ensure comfortable use and excellent sound insulation. All other AKG K245 components are made of metal, making them durable and reliable, and they can be folded.
The shape of these earbuds creates an ideal position for all types of heads, thanks to the automatic headband adjustment.
Huawei FreeBuds Studio is a comfortable headphone. The ear cushions are soft, large, and deep: fit any ears; the downforce is comfortable: it doesn’t press anything, doesn’t rub; the lining of the headband is also soft: it does not bother at all. You can spend several hours wearing headphones without discomfort.
Of course, it’s frustrating that the headphones don’t fold. You can only turn the bowls. It can be carried around the neck. But in a backpack or bag, they take up a lot of space, moreover, in a case. But on the head, they look neat and do not “chew” the owner.
The AKG K245 is very comfortable to wear. At first, at 284 grams (excluding cables), it is below the average for over-ear headphones. Heat build-up is not an issue with open headphones due to the design. The contact pressure is light to moderate.
The AKG-typical headband with self-adjustment distributes the pressure over a large area over my skull. So it can do without a thick layer of padding, and after a few minutes of listening to music, it has completely disappeared from my perception. Great.
There is just enough space in the interior of the ear pads for my medium-sized ears. They adapt well and are covered with comfortable synthetic leather. All in all, the best comfort is offered.
The frequency response is very good, from 4 to 48,000 Hz. But it is not entirely clear why such “latitude” is. After all, it is believed that a person hears from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, and that is not all. In addition, over a wireless connection, it is from 20 to 20,000 Hz that is transmitted as standard. But still, what about the sound? The sound is really good.
Headphones Huawei FreeBuds Studio is equipped with active noise canceling system. The noise reduction is good, but it falls short of the leaders (Sony and Bose). At the maximum level, both low-frequency sounds and part of the mid-frequency noise are well choked. At the same time, there is no particularly unpleasant pressure on the ears. There is background noise, though. But only in the “ultra” mode. There is little or no influence of noise reduction on sound quality.
The headphones sound convincing when listening to different genres of music. In general, the music reaches the ears in the form the creators wanted to convey it. Therefore, what genre the owner prefers does not matter – everything will sound bright, dynamic, and pleasant. Therefore, the HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio headphones are suitable for mixing different tracks and listening to rock after classics and pop.
The sound is detailed; the high frequencies are well developed, the bass is soft and elastic. The bass is not too punchy, so lovers of low frequencies will need to play with the settings. There is additional processing to the sound, but it is delicate and precise to feel natural. By quality HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio can be compared with the Sony WH-1000XM4; this model is inferior to the sensational headphones from Sony. The HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio headphones support the SBC, AAC, and L2HC codecs. The model’s review made it possible to find out since there is no such information.
The AKG K245 sounds pleasantly deeply padded, and the bass is accurate for the price range. The large, 50mm diameter drivers do a great job.
In the field of sibilants, the AKG K245 is extremely mild; sharpness is completely alien to it. On the one hand, this enables long studio sessions without symptoms of fatigue but also carries the risk of mixing up with excessive sibilants, prominent cymbals, etc.
The last foothills of the middle and the lower highs seem inhibited. Only the top, finely chiseled heights are visible again. Studio headphones declared as mix monitoring could be more balanced.
The spatial separation of individual instruments and sounds in the stereo panorama is not very differentiated. Compared to the now cheaper classics like the Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO, the AKG K245 leaves springs. After all: the middle of the phantom is visible, something I miss with so many other mid-range studio headphones.
In terms of dynamics, the AKG K245 shows a very decent performance; transients are clearly defined. However, this is sometimes counteracted by the overall too powerful bass range.
HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio headphones have good sound and noise cancellation. They are suitable for listening to different music, and for watching video content and games too. Noise cancellation, thanks to 6 microphones, is very high quality. If you want to isolate yourself from the whole world to enjoy your favorite tracks, then HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio is the right choice. Add to this good battery life and ergonomics the presence of nice features – transparent sound, reaction to the removal of the headphones, and we get almost perfect headphones.
The main problem of Bluetooth HUAWEI FreeBuds Studio is the unexpected price. It’s just that we are not used to Huawei headphones costing so much. But if you evaluate the model in terms of price and quality, it certainly deserves a high cost.
The AKG K245 is a thoroughly successful headphone. The open, dynamic player plays tonally balanced, with minimally emphasized bass, considerate presences, and a slightly more cautious super high frequency. It does very well for the price range in terms of dynamics and plasticity/stage, even if these are not its proven parade disciplines.
It is particularly well suited for continuous listening to music – and that means the long day: Both the sound and the comfortable wearing properties make it a veritable marathon listener. If you also consider that it is very mobile thanks to its folding mechanism and does not leave any nasty scars in the wallet, it is worth a recommendation.
Ugreen HiTune T2 vs Ugreen HiTune True: Wireless Earbuds Comparision
Anyone who hears Ugreen will primarily think of charging cables and power banks. But the Chinese manufacturer has also expanded into the true wireless sector for a while and is trying to make a name for itself there.
Ugreen Hitune and equipping its TWS with the high-resolution aptX codec. For a retail price of barely more than $30, that’s an announcement. We therefore put the Ugreen HiTune T2 with Ugreen HiTune True clarified whether it has what it takes to stand out from the crowd.
Pros and Cons
|Ugreen HiTune T2||Ugreen HiTune True|
|Surprisingly good microphones||High resolution aptX codec|
|Good wearing comfort||Differentiated, neutral sound|
|Full music control||Long battery life|
|Good price / performance||Good price / performance|
|No aptX||No volume control|
|No app connection||Low background noise|
|Ugreen HiTune T2||Ugreen HiTune True|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Model||HiTune T2||HiTune True|
|Released||March 29, 2021||June 29, 2020|
|Dimension||0.79 x 1.18 x 1.57 inches||0.02 x 0.02 x 0.07 inches|
|Type||In Ear||In Ear|
|Frequency Response||–||20Hz-20,000 Hz|
|Audio Codec||–||Qualcomm aptX, AAC, SBC|
|Colors||White, Black, Blue, Pink||Black|
|Driver||14mm Drivers||5.8 mm|
|ANC||ENC Noise Canceling||Qualcomm cVc 8.0|
|Bluetooth Codecs||HSP, HFP, AVRCP, A2DP||HSP, HFP, AVRCP, A2DP|
|Battery Life||Upto 20 hrs||Upto 27 hrs|
|Charging time||1.5 Hours||2 Hours|
|Charging Port||USB C||USB C|
Ugreen HiTune T2- You cannot compare the two models directly with each other and it is not a successor, you can already see that in the optics. While the Ugreen HiTune T2 has a rod design for hanging, the HiTune are classic in-ear TWS.
The pricing remains pleasant. For 45$ Ugreen continues to use large drivers, but saves aptX. Like almost all manufacturers, Ugreen mainly uses plastic for the housing. The HiTune T2 are no exception. Of course, Apple comes to mind at first glance, especially when the earbuds are completely white.
But on closer inspection, several differences emerge. The Ugreen HiTune T2 has a significantly more angular shape on the outside. The rod is thicker and the earpiece is also a bit larger. In addition, useful functions such as the proximity sensor that detects whether the headphones are hanging in the ear are missing .
There are two microphones , a status LED on the top, and the possibility to operate the earbuds via touch control. By the way, the primary microphone is, as usual with these models, on the underside of the stem between the charging contacts.
The charging station is also designed more classically. This also means that the station cannot be set up, only laying is possible. But that doesn’t matter in this case, because Ugreen has at least come up with good arguments against setting the HiTune T2.
Ugreen is comparatively broad in terms of color.The standard versions in black and white , the HiTune T2, are also available in pink and a dark blue.
Ugreen HiTune True- The headphones are small and handy. Including the charging cradle, the whole product weighs only 46 grams of the scale. With dimensions of 6.2 x 3.5 x 3.6 millimeters, the case disappears in every jacket pocket without attracting any attention. The case is made entirely of plastic and has a slightly roughened surface that is relatively well protected against scratches.
The shell can be opened via a folding mechanism. The earphones are held in place with a magnet, which effectively prevents them from accidentally falling out. All seals of approval and a few technical data were printed inconspicuously on the underside of the shell. There is a contemporary USB-C port for charging on the back of the charging cradle. It is very nice that Ugreen no longer uses the outdated micro-USB for the inexpensive TWS.
Basically, with the design of the chopsticks, the wearing comfort is good. Nothing is pushed into the ear canal, and no material wants to spread in it. You hang the earbud in the outer ear. There are only a few exceptions to this negative circumstance. Fortunately, the Ugreen T2 is not one of them.
However, the earbuds are quite large at 4.3 x 1.6 x 1.9 centimeters (L x W x D). The stick also looks relatively thick. The T2 found a good grip in my ears but did not stay in the best possible position when readjusting, which was detrimental to the sound. You’re well-positioned when it comes to weight. Each earbud weighs 5.5 grams. They feel a little heavier, but that’s still fine.
Due to its shape, the station is, of course quite flexible. Pants or jacket pockets are equally possible. Without earbuds, the station only weighs 43.4 grams.
There is also officially water protection, namely IPX5, and I can justifiably say that a shortfall into the water cannot harm the headphones. This is what happened with shaving. The T2 put that away well and just kept on playing. Nevertheless, be careful around water, especially at the station, which, as is so often the case, has not received certification.
The headphones weigh 5 grams each and also have a black plastic housing. On the bottom, there are two charging pins and an L&R to mark the side. Most noticeable feature of headphones is the touch surface on the outside, on which the manufacturer has printed its logo. This points outwards when wearing the headphones and allows control by touch. In contrast to models with a physical button on the outside, you don’t have the problem here of pushing the headphones into the ear canal when using them. The headphones sit firmly in the ear canal and hold easily even when jogging.
Both the charging cradle and the headphones have a restrained design and are solidly processed. Ugreen relies on an inconspicuous appearance with the Hitune, which we welcome. In addition, the headphones and case are very compact, and the headphones are very comfortable to wear.
Ugreen HiTune T2- As always the most challenging discipline, but also the most important. Ugreen sends the HiTune T2 into the race with a moderate repertoire of codecs. For you, that means there is no aptX. But at least AAC and, of course, SBC. As always, Bluetooth 5.0 is also included. You can score with the size of the driver. This amounts to 14.2 mm, so quite a buzz. Once again, the driver should have a titanium alloy, which can ensure good heights, but it doesn’t have to be. It all depends on the complete work, and I do not want to withhold the assessment of it from you.
The fit of the HiTune T2 and all of the hanging earbuds directly influences the sonic quality of what you hear. The most significant weak point is that the area between the ear and the headphones are not sealed correctly.
Therefore, the Ugreen HiTune T2 didn’t sound that great to me. I heard the music tinny and distant. Only when I had almost stuffed the HiTune T2 into my ear canal could the drivers develop their full potential, and they are good. But so many details and dynamics are lost between the loudspeaker and my eardrum that the earbuds only sound very flat without pressure.
But if you have the right ears for these earbuds, you can hear a lot of music. The bass is then vital, even if it is very imprecise and overlapping. The heights are great. The Titan driver may help to achieve a clear sound image again. Anyway, it fits. Mids also get away quite acceptable, even if there is a slight lack of precession here.
All in all, some details are missing, including when pushing into the ear canal. A little less bass, cleaner mids, and you have a pretty good earbud. The equalizer can adjust this a bit, but you can’t get the adjustment 100%.
Stereo is not a problem for the HiTune T2, but the spatial representation is also not remarkably accurate. The stereo division works well, but I can’t say whether the strings are much closer than the bass or further away.
That’s why Ugreen thought of gaming fans. Because they will be happy about the gaming mode, which lowers the latency to a low 60 ms, right? In my test, I hardly noticed a difference between the 60 ms and without gaming mode. On the other hand, the sound quality has passed into the abyss due to the gaming mode in earnest.
Ugreen HiTune True- As mentioned in the introduction, the high-resolution aptX codec is the distinguishing feature that sets the Ugreen Hitune apart from the competition. To use this codec, it must, of course, also be supported by the smartphone. In general, all reasonably up-to-date smartphones from Samsung, Xiaomi, Realme, Oppo, Vivo, and so on offer such support. However, Apple and Huawei should be mentioned as manufacturers without aptX support. Anyone who owns a smartphone from this manufacturer will play music via the AAC codec. This is also not a bad choice (Apple’s Earpods run with AAC, for example), but it is simply a downgrade to aptX.
In terms of sound quality, the Ugreen Hitune can deliver an excellent overall picture. Highs and mids are balanced and do not distort even at the highest volume. There is a decent amount of bass and enough to get you going while exercising. Even very dark basses are still reproduced without overly superimposing the rest. The overall sound image is designed for the most precise reproduction possible. So it is more about headphones for audiophile listeners on a (very) small budget than headphones for the main-bass-pops group. A specific spatiality is created when listening to a beautiful backdrop in front of the inner eye.
Only good things can, of course, not be said about the sound of the Hitune. After all, there have to be compromised, especially with such cheap headphones. The sound is designed for the highs and mids rather than the bass and therefore only develops a driving force at high volume. On the other hand, when listening quietly, one sometimes has the impression that the sound lacks ground and does not harmonize entirely. There is also a slight background noise that is not noticeable when listening to music.
The USB Type-C port on the underside , so you don’t have to set up the station for charging. Furthermore, an induction coil is embedded in the station’s back, so you can also charge the station wirelessly using a standard Qi charging pad, so it has to be lying down. The third point concerns the lid. This has a hard snap- in point at maximum opening. This means that the station can also be laid down when it is open, without the lid closing on its own.
Only the button on the back doesn’t fit into the concept. If you press this, it shows the current charge status of the station on the front via a white LED. This is hidden under the plastic in Xiaomi fashion, so it is only visible when activated. However, the same message appears when you open or close the case, so the button on the back is somehow unnecessary.
Fortunately, the pairing worked straight away and without any problems. If you connect the headphones and the smartphone, you will hear the energetic English voice that tells you exactly that. The voice output is used in several places, such as when activating or deactivating the gaming mode.
After pairing, the earbuds are controlled via touch inputs. The touch field is at the top of the handle. In principle, the Ugreen logo marks the spot. With a bit of practice, the inputs are implemented quickly and precisely.
Press L / R once: pause / play
Press L twice: decrease volume
Press L three times: previous track
Press R twice: increase volume
Press R three times: next track
Press L / R for two seconds: Voice Assistant
Press L / R once for a call: accept / end
Press L / R for two seconds for a call: reject
Since there are no attachments for the Ugreen HiTune T2, there is no need to worry about the space inside. This is sufficient to remove and does not have to accommodate any extra plugs or attachments. Again owing to the design, the earbuds are placed in the charging station. But now I prefer lying earbuds. It’s easier to get to the charging contacts. Only by the way.
To connect the headphones to the smartphone or laptop, they simply have to be removed from the case. If there is no other device in the vicinity to which the headphones are already connected, switch to pairing mode, which is indicated by the left earbud flashing alternately blue / white while the right earbud is not lit. After successful pairing, the connection will be established automatically in the future when you take the headphones out of the case. It is also possible to connect just one headphone to the smartphone while the other is housed in the shell.
The headphones are operated entirely via the touch field on the outside. The concept was successful and there were no incorrect entries due to the large area. The following commands can be registered.
1 x tap left or right: Play / Pause
2 x tapping left or right: next title
3 x taps left or right: the previous title
Tap for two seconds: switch on
Six seconds of tapping: switch off
Two seconds of tapping when switched on: Activate the voice assistant
In addition, calls can be accepted with a single tap or rejected with a long tap. If your smartphone no longer recognizes the headphones, they can be reset to the factory settings by inserting them into the shell and simultaneously pressing the touch fields for 10 seconds. Overall, with a little practice, the operating concept is quickly internalized and works without any faults or faults. However, it is a bit of a shame that Hitune has not integrated the ability to change the volume on the headphones. No app can be used to import firmware updates or configure operations.
Ugreen HiTune T2- The earbuds are each equipped with a 40 mAh battery; the charging station even received 500 mAh. The two capacities are in slight contrast because 40 mAh are more in the lower midfield, while 500 mAh are already in the upper midfield.
With the 40 mAh, you can get there for 5 hours, according to Ugreen. Which, of course, is not the truth. Still, the earbuds do surprisingly well. At 70-80% volume, I got up to 4 hours of playing time—a gratifyingly high figure. At 100 %, however, you sag to 3 hours, while 50% only bring about 30 minutes more.
In purely mathematical terms, both earbuds in the station can be charged more than 6 times. Practically the usual 4 charges were in there and a little more. On the other hand, thanks to the Quick Charge technology, charging was pleasantly quick. 15 minutes is enough for about an hour of music.
As for the station, it is in the normal environment for a full charge at 1.5 hours. Anyone who overlooked it at the beginning will be pleased that the Ugreen HiTune T2 supports inductive charging. In this case, the charging time doubles to almost 3 hours.
Ugreen HiTune True- The individual earbuds have a capacity of 60mAh, and the case in turn 300mAh. Overall, this is enough for two full charges with a bit of remaining capacity. The left and right accompanying charging process LED lights on the case, which go out the process has been completed. The manufacturer is optimistic that the runtime of the headphones is 9 hours. In practice, however, you get closer to 5 hours at 70% volume. Still, this is a good result. The charging time for a full charge is 1.5 hours. Here, too, the manufacturer’s specification of 2 hours of music after 15 minutes of loading is a bit exaggerated. One hour is achieved after 15 minutes of charging.
For people looking for casual headphones, the Ugreen HiTune T2 could be just the thing. Connoisseurs tend to go for the Omthing AirFree Buds, which in turn have other small weaknesses but are in the same price range and offer the better sound. If you don’t find what you are looking for here, you might want to look at our TWS best list.
Overall, the Ugreen Hitune can leave an excellent impression on our test. The TWS headphones are well made, have good battery life, and deliver a decent sound. If you only have a small budget and are looking for neutrally mixed headphones with a high-resolution codec, you can confidently access them. However, you shouldn’t spend more than 40 $ on the Ugreen Hitune because then the savings on the 1More Stylish are no longer worthwhile, which go one better in terms of sound quality.
SteelSeries Apex 3 TKL vs Steelseries Apex 3: Which is Better Keyboard
SteelSeries is a brand that knows how to make powerful, affordable and simple devices. The SteelSeries Apex 3 keyboard is the perfect example...
Huawei FreeBuds Studio vs AKG K245: Headphone Comparison
Huawei FreeBuds Studio is a full-size wireless active noise-canceling headphones. The first model in this segment is from Huawei. Claimed:...
2021 Newest Dell XPS 15 OLED 9510 Laptop Review
Do not be fooled by its unchanged design; each year, Dell takes advantage of the arrival of a new generation...
Ugreen HiTune T2 vs Ugreen HiTune True: Wireless Earbuds Comparision
Anyone who hears Ugreen will primarily think of charging cables and power banks. But the Chinese manufacturer has also expanded...
Technics EAH-AZ60 vs Technics EAH-AZ70W: Dual Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones
The Technics AZ70 True Wireless headphones from the high fidelity range from 200$. The selection here is very small, the...
Jabra Elite 7 Pro Vs Jabra Elite 7 Active: Which TWS Should You Buy
The Danish manufacturer Jabra was, alongside Apple, one of the first providers of TWS (True Wireless Stereo) headphones. This refers...
Logitech G Pro X Superlight vs Razer Viper Ultimate Wireless: Gaming Mouse Comparision
At the beginning of 2021, G Pro X Superlight will be competing for the crown at the highest level with Razer’s...
Acer Aspire Vero Intel Core i5 Laptop Review
The manufacture of a computer is often relatively energy-intensive. The materials used are often aluminum, magnesium, something solid certainly, but...
MSI GP76 Leopard Gaming Laptop With RTX 3070 Review
Having a PC to play is, in my opinion, the best gaming option. Nevertheless, buying a tower requires space; shortages...
AfterShokz Aeropex vs AfterShokz Trekz Air: Wireless Bone Conduction Headphones
Aftershokz is a brand that was founded in 2011 and has been selling boneconducting headphones for several years. For me,...
Bowers & Wilkins PX7 vs Bowers & Wilkins PX5: Active Noise Cancelling Headset Review
The Bowers and Wilkins PX7 visually, it resembles the slightly smaller PX5, and technically it is very similar technology. Even...
Sendy Audio Aiva Magnetic vs AKG K371 Closed-Back Headphones Review
Sendy Audio, a newcomer is entering the market for high-quality headphones. The first product from the Chinese, is now also...
WEARABLES3 months ago
Coros Vertix 2 vs Coros Vertix: Adventure GPS Watch
TABLETS2 months ago
2021 Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6: Tablet For Your Daily Needs
WEARABLES3 months ago
Huawei Watch 3 Pro: Smartwatch With Harmony OS
WEARABLES2 months ago
Fitbit Charge 5 Review: Connected Bracelet with ECG
WEARABLES3 months ago
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 3
WEARABLES2 months ago
Apple Watch Series 6 vs Apple Watch Series 7: What to Expect
MONITOR2 months ago
Dell 32 USB-C Hub P3222QE Review: Best 4K Monitor
TABLETS2 months ago
Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro: Powerful 8520 mAh Battery