Connect with us

MONITOR

Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD vs Asus VG27AQ: 27 Inch Gaming Monitors

We are back again with another interesting comparison for you. Today we have two gaming monitors from the 27-inch gaming monitor segment, Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD 27 vs Asus VG27AQE 27. We will compare both of these monitors to know which one is really suitable for your choices.

Pros and Cons

Viewsonic Asus
Amazing response time165Hz refresh
Amazing ColourSolid settings menu
AMD FreeSync up to 144HzFreeSync/G-Sync compatible
High pixel densityGood color accuracy
Bad ergonomics.High price
No extra gaming features.Mediocre brightness uniformity

Key Specification

Viewsonic Asus
BrandViewsonicAsus
SeriesMHD
ModelVX2758-2KPVG27AQE
Gaming MonitorYes GamingYes Gaming
WebcamNoNo
Weight with Stand5.3 kg5.9 kg
ColourBlackBlack
Dimension615.0 x 450.0 x 189.0 mm620 x 363 x 66 mm
Power Consumption43 W0.5 W

Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD

The design is very basic using standard black plastic with a few silver highlights. It’s not particularly thin it doesn’t use any fancy materials but at the same time. It doesn’t look bad it’s a fine mid-range design that seems reasonably well put together. We’d have liked to see a nicer stand here, in particular, both from a materials and ergonomics standpoint. But you can understand why they went down the cheap route to ensure that there’s an overall low price point that the VX2758 doesn’t have is a particularly agonic standard.

There is no height adjustment here just tilt support so if you want to raise the screen from its fairly low sitting position. You’ll need to make use of the phaser mount depending on whether you have a Vaser arm or not this can add a bit of cost to the overall unit price if you do need height adjustability. The overall dimensions of this monitor are 615.0 x 450.0 x 189.0 mm and also it weighs around 5.3 Kg so it is fairly lighter in terms of weight.

RELATED:  Compare: Gigabyte G34WQC 34 Ultrawide vs Cooler Master GM34-CW 34 Curved

Asus VG27AQE 27

This is one of the few monitor designs from Asus in the last few years that we actually like it’s a lot more subtle than their crazy ROG designs. With RGB lighting and weird patterns all over the place but it’s still definitely a gamer-oriented aesthetic with red highlights and hard angles almost all the exposed surfaces are plastic of some kind. So no metals or anything like that and a lot of it is just your standard basic black plastic. But it works nothing crazy is required here and the overall build quality is pretty good.

One thing we really appreciate about this design is the highly adjustable stand. We’re getting the works here with height tilt swivel and pivot support. The range of height adjustment is above average and it’s great to get enough pivot support to use.

The monitor in a portrait orientation there is a base amount available as well just in case you need it and despite offering all this stuff the stand is sturdy and doesn’t wobble. The overall dimension of this monitor is 620 x 363 x 66 mm and it weighs around 5.9 Kg which is a little bit heavier than the ViewSonic monitor.

Picture/Display

Viewsonic Asus
$CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
Display TypeIPS-Type LCDIPS-Type LCD
Size27 inch27 inch
TouchscreenNoNo
CurvedNoNo
FinishMatteMatte
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Resolution2560 x 1440 pixel2560 x 1440 pixel
Pixel Density109 ppi109 ppi
Response Time1 ms (MPRT)1 ms (MPRT)
Refresh Rate144 Hz155 Hz

Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD

The VX27582KP-MHD is a very attractive monitor for a couple of reasons. It’s a 27-inch 1440p 144 hertz IPS gaming monitor so it’s hitting all those key specifications that gamers love to see and really nailing that sweet spot. But it offers this and a budget-oriented price tag of around 320 US dollars going on pricing in the last few months this makes it the cheapest high refresh 1440p IPS monitor on the market undercutting other popular options and offering more value-oriented alternative to some flagship models. It’s not as cheap as some VA options.

RELATED:  Top 2: SAMSUNG ODYSSEY G7 32 vs ASUS TUF GAMING VG27AQ 27

The VX27582KP-MHD has a lot of other features you’ll be after for gaming like Adaptive-Sync support with low framerate compensation and a backlight strobing mode for blur reduction. It is a wide gamut panel with a rated 96% DCI p3 coverage but there’s no HDR functionality as you’d probably expect from a mid-range monitor.

Asus VG27AQE 27

It’s a 27-inch 1440p 165 Hertz IPS display so that’s the sweet spot for resolution refresh rate and panel technology for gaming. It’s one of those things that ticks a lot of boxes the next factor is it includes a feature called LNB Sync. Which for the first time allows you to use adaptive sync variable refresh rates and blur reducing backlight strobing at the same time. The overall picture is its price tag of 430 US dollars for this sort of monitor is very competitive in today’s market especially given its 165 Hertz refresh rate and feature.

There’s plenty of features here crosshairs timers FPS counters shadow boosting and blue light filters are some of the major inclusion C plus, of course, LNB synched for backlight strobing more mid-range and budget options often don’t bother with decent feature sets but the Asus is keeping the VG27A too strong in this regard.

Connectivity

Viewsonic Asus
HDMI2.0 x 21.4 x 2
DisplayPort1.4 x 11.2 x 1
Audio Out-put3.5 mm3.5 mm
HDCPNoYes
USBNoType-A x 1
Type-B x 2
RJ45NoNo
Memory Card SlotsNoNo
Built-in Speakers2 x 2.5WNo
G-SYNC SupportYes (Compatible)Yes (Compatible)
FreeSync SupportYes (Compatible)Yes (Compatible)

Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD

Talking about the connectivity options. With Viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD you will get two 2.0 HDMI ports and one 1.4 DisplayPort. It also gets a 3.5mm headphone jack for the audio output. It won’t offer any of the USB options which is kind of weird for any monitor. There are also two built-in speakers which are of terrible quality worse than laptop quality.

RELATED:  4K Monitor: ASUS TUF Gaming 27 HDR Gaming Monitor

Asus VG27AQE 27

The Asus VG27AQE 27 comes with two 1.4 HDMI ports and one 1.2 DisplayPort. It got a 3.5mm headphone jack. It does come with a Type-A and a Type-B USB port Additionally it got an HDCP port which is quite a good thing. But it won’t get an in-built speaker setup so you have to buy an external speaker set up for this one.

Both of these devices does compatible with the G-Synch and Free-Synch support which is excellent for gaming-oriented buyers.

Power

Viewsonic Asus
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz100-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyInternalExternal

Moving towards the power options you will require a 100-240VAC,50/60Hz power with the power on mode. And also the ViewSonic monitor requires an internal type of power supply and the Asus monitor requires an external type of power supply.

Which is better!

Both of these devices are pretty identical in terms of screen size, aspect ratio, and resolution. But when it comes to the picture quality and proper gaming features then the Asus VG27AQE really outshines the ViewSonic monitor also both of them served on the different price tag in the market so it also depends on the budget of the buyer.

MONITOR

Samsung U32R590 Curved UHD vs Samsung Space SR75 UHD 4K

The Samsung U32R590 monitor is one of the cheapest 32-inch Ultra HD models on the market. We, therefore, wanted to know what it really is. The Samsung S32R750UEU is a rather original monitor whose foot is clamped on the back edge of the desk to free up space. It remains to be seen in this test whether the image quality is there.

Pros and Cons

Samsung U32R590Samsung Space SR75 UHD
Cable management system.Contrast compared to an IPS monitor.
Reactivity.Delay in posting.
Image quality.Original design freeing up space on the desk.
No height adjustment.Height adjustment linked to that of the inclination.
No USB hub.Limited connectivity.
Lack of FreeSync / G-Sync compatibility.No USB hub.

The Samsung U32R590 monitor features a curved VA LCD panel over a radius of 1.5 m (1500R) and displaying an Ultra HD definition of 3840 x 2160 px. The manufacturer claims a maximum brightness of 250 cd / m², a contrast of 2500: 1, viewing angles of 178, and a response time of 4 ms. The refresh rate is limited to 60 Hz and this monitor is not compatible with the FreeSync and G-Sync variable refresh technologies, which is a shame with such a definition. Finally, the ergonomics are also limited, but we will come back to that.

The Samsung S32R750UEU monitor has a 32-inch VA panel displaying an Ultra HD definition of 3,840 x 2,160 px. The manufacturer announces a maximum brightness of 300 cd / m², a contrast of 2,500: 1, viewing angles of 178, and a response time of 4 ms. This model stands out above all for its original foot which clamps the desk and thus saves a lot of workspaces. On this point, it is clearly an innovation in the monitor market and it avoids purchasing a mounting arm separately.

RELATED:  4K Monitor: ASUS TUF Gaming 27 HDR Gaming Monitor

Key Specification

Samsung U32R590Samsung Space SR75 UHD
$CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
BrandSamsungSamsung
SeriesU32R590SR75
Gaming MonitorYes CurvedNo
WebcamNoNo
Weight with Stand8.16 kg9.34 kg
ColourBlackBlack
Dimension714 x 516 x 239 mm714 x 602 x x 114 mm
Power Consumption59 W59 W

Picture/Display

Samsung U32R590Samsung Space SR75 UHD
Display TypeLCDVA LCD
Size32 inch32 inch
TouchscreenNoNo
CurvedYes 1500RNo
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Resolution3840 x 2160 pixel3840 x 2160 pixel
Pixel Density137 ppi139 ppi
Response Time4 ms (GtG)4 ms (GtG)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz

Connectivity

Samsung U32R590Samsung Space SR75 UHD
HDMI2.0 x 12.0 x 1
DisplayPort1.2 x 11.2 x 1
Audio Out-put3.5 mmNo
HDCPNoNo
USBNoNo
RJ45NoNo
Built-in SpeakersNoNo
G-SYNC SupportNo
FreeSync SupportYes

Power

Samsung U32R590Samsung Space SR75 UHD
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz100-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyExternalExternal
DC Input Power

Which is better!

Samsung U32R590

The Samsung U32R590 is a good, well-calibrated Ultra HD monitor that benefits from a very good finish at this price point. Too bad it skips the FreeSync and is content with basic ergonomics. For the rest, it should satisfy both casual gamers and those looking for an affordable large Ultra HD monitor.

Samsung Space SR75 UHD

The Samsung Space Monitor S32R750UEU has an original design that frees up space on the desk thanks to its arm and its ingenious cable passage. And the image quality is not left out, very good right out of the box, without the need for calibration. The Samsung Space Monitor would still deserve a little more connection (USB and USB-C) and an improvement of the orientation system of the panel to make it independent of the height.

RELATED:  Asus PG35VQ vs Acer Predator X35: Best HDR Monitor

Continue Reading

MONITOR

AOC Q2781PQ vs BenQ SW271: Professional IPS Monitors

Here we have two gaming monitors that having a 27-inch screen size. The 27-inch gaming monitors are nowadays so popular that they are the most selling gaming monitor segment because of their compact size and budget-friendly pricing the buyers really convincing to buying them. Here we have AOC Q2781PQ 27 and BenQ SW271 27, we will compare them to know which is really worth your consideration.

Pros and Cons

AOC Q2781PQ 27BenQ SW271 27
IPS panelEasy calibration maintains accuracy
Best post-calibration accuracyColor calibration
2.5K resolutionBuilt-in card reader
Low accuracyExcellent wide gamut
Not adjustable tilt downExpensive

Key Specification

AOC Q2781PQ 27BenQ SW271 27
$CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
BrandAOCBenQ
Model Q2781PQSW271
Gaming MonitorNoNo
WebcamNoNo
Weight with Stand5.23 kg9.3 kg
ColourBlack & WhiteBlack
Dimension614.68 x 452.12 x 198.12 mm613.8 x 610.9 x 213.4 mm
Power Consumption45 W43.38 W

AOC Q2781PQ 27

It all starts with the design this is arguably the main selling point of this monitor and it’s an almost bezel list-style display well we mean by that is that the bezels are really thin and there isn’t hid that just really isn’t much here to look at. There are monitors elbow with a similar style bezel that doesn’t parade around the fact that it’s bezels this thin but they’re a lot more expensive and this does look very nice. The stand as well looks good and the whole thing when you put it on your desk.

If you’re going for a minimalist design this really will stick in there nicely there are a few trade-offs for this design though and that, unfortunately. Comes in the adjustment department. So if you do want to put this on your mount you won’t be able to do it and you don’t have any adjustments other than tilt. The main problem here is height adjustment and pretty much every desk. We put this on we’ve found the monitors just a little bit too low for our liking granted most people will get used to this but when it’s so simple as a height adjustment feature is a shame it’s not here.

RELATED:  LG 38 Inch UltraGear Nano IPS Curved Gaming Monitor

BenQ SW271 27

This thing nice fan it’s pretty heavy again. All of this is kind of metal underneath it. We get just plastic on the outside but it’s metal on the inside. So a lot of weight holding this thing down pretty easy to carry. So it’s nice and easy to pour it around again tons of ports on this thing so basically anything that you’re using if any of you out there love cable management hiding those cables don’t have a whole lot of options.

You can just push things through here and that’s it you’re gonna see them unless your monitors down and then we’ll kind of remain mostly out of sight but a lot of you guys are looking for ten-bit HDR it’s gonna be a whole lot of fun using this thing out at $1,100 is what the prices have got some links in this article to check this monitor out. It is not cheap for a monitor is the most expensive one you may ever own. However, if you want ten-bit in each yarn a monitor it is pretty difficult to find anything cheaper than this from a reliable company this monitor comes with a three-year warranty on it which is also really nice again.

Picture/Display

AOC Q2781PQ 27BenQ SW271 27
Display TypeAH-IPSIPS-Type LCD
Size27 inch27 inch
Dynamic Contrast Ratio50000000:120000000:1
TouchscreenNoNo
CurvedNoNo
FinishMatteMatte
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Resolution2560 x 1440 pixel3840 x 2160 pixel
Pixel Density109 ppi163 ppi
Response Time4 ms (millisecond)5 ms (GtG)
Refresh Rate76 Hz60 Hz

AOC Q2781PQ 27

This is a solid choice the IPS panel is really good here the color accuracy is on point everything is quite vibrant. It does pop a fair amount and just for most things that you’re going to be using it for it does do a good job. If you do want to play some games on this monitor then it’s not a bad choice at all.

RELATED:  Compare: Gigabyte G32QC Curved vs BenQ EX2780Q QHD Monitor

The blind controller games is a real joy we mean you’re not going to notice much difference between this and a TV or 144 Hertz monitor, to be honest with the controller you can’t notice as much of a difference so hooking up an Xbox via HDMI socket you actually will have a very competitive game on this one. But it was a yeah it was a good experience nonetheless as we move over to the PC side of things again.

If you want to play controller games it’s a solid choice you want to play something like an RTS or something like civilization. Again it’s a very good choice because you’re not going to need anything more than 60 Hertz and the resolution and that IPS panel mean that games look nice and very smooth as well.

We would say there probably is a small amount of input lag not that much and it’s only 60 Hertz as well. So if you do want to play first-person shooters or you want to play competitively and this is the reason why you’re buying this monitor is probably not the best choice for you. It is not so bad in terms of gaming and it won’t be a bad experience at all. But if you’re doing something like video editing photo editing or general productivity of any kind the resolution helps here.

BenQ SW271 27

As far as 27-inch known photo monitors are regarded, the BenQ SW271 quite produces great affordability, however, more significantly this holds a 4K resolution display, an extra adaptable collection of inputs, and some extra working support to help with workflow capabilities.

RELATED:  Acer Nitro VG271 IPS Monitor with AMD Radeon FreeSync Technology

The primary and leading thing is that the combination of a 27-inch display and 4K resolution remains a great one concerning both photographers and video-makers identical as it remains able to quite determine the nice features produced by the modern generation of higher-res sensors in both DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. This also guarantees rendering beats are yet very small and, in physical terms, it’s not too big so it’s relatively simple to move throughout and doesn’t take up an unnecessary measure of workspace.

Connectivity

AOC Q2781PQ 27BenQ SW271 27
HDMI1.4 x 22.0 x 2
DisplayPort1.2 x 11.4 x 1
Audio Out-put3.5 mmYes
HDCPYesYes V 2.2
USBD-Sub x 1Type-A x 2
Type-B x 1
Type-C x 1
RJ45NoNo
Memory Card Slots1 x SDXC
Built-in SpeakersNoNo
G-SYNC SupportNoNo
FreeSync SupportNoNo

AOC Q2781PQ 27

In terms of inputs, it comes with a lot of ports. First of all, it got two 1.4 HDMI ports and one 1.2 DisplayPort. It also got an HDCP port which is a good thing. For the audio output, it got a 3.5 mm headphone jack. It also gets a USB-D sub for the USB connectivity. This monitor doesn’t come with a memory card slot.

BenQ SW271 27

The BenQ SW271 27 comes with two 2.0 HDMI ports and one 1.4 DisplayPort. For USB connectivity it will get two Type-A, a Type-B, and a Type-C USB port. Surprisingly it got a memory card slot which is an additional option for the user. It does get a 2.2 HDCI port which is again a good thing. For audio output, it does get a 3.5mm headphone jack. Both of these monitors don’t get any kind of in-built speaker set up so you have a buy an aftermarket external speaker set up for both of these monitors.

Power

AOC Q2781PQ 27BenQ SW271 27
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz90-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyExternalInternal
DC Input Power10 W (USB Type-C)

Moving towards the power options from the above table you can observe that the AOC Q2781PQ 27 requires a 100-240VAC,50/60Hz, and the BenQ SW271 27 does require a 90-240VAC,50/60Hz of power on the power-on mode, and also the BenQ monitor additionally requires a 10 W (USB Type-C) DC input power. The BenQ monitor requires an internal type of power supply whereas the AOC monitor requires an external type of power supply.

Which is better!

AOC Q2781PQ 27

If you’re in the market for a svelte looking 27-inch display for daily practice that gives a reliable execution and a definite WQHD image, the AOC Q2781PQ remains unquestionably deserving consideration. Its IPS panel produces true colors, and it is more than sufficient for easygoing gaming.

BenQ SW271 27

The SW271, however, holds affordability as the main temptation, though it plays pretty strongly with costly 4K models in terms of performance, efficiency, versatility, and calibration perspective so it’s likewise about absolute value-for-money than the original price tag. Add the USB-C port, HDR mode, including hardware calibration, plus you’re receiving a number of the pro-level monitor’s features for your money.

Continue Reading

MONITOR

Comparision Between: ViewSonic XG3240C vs BenQ EX3203R

Here we back again with another interesting comparison for guys. Today we have two gaming monitors that come with the same size of 32 inches. ViewSonic and BenQ are the two brands which are generally known for their value for money products and we expect the same thing from these two monitors. So we will compare ViewSonic XG3240C and BenQ EX3203R to which one is better for your choices.

 

Pros and Cons

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Great gaming featuresAmazing smooth 165 Hz panel
Excellent RGB lighting system.FreeSync 2 and G-Sync
Backlight strobe option up to 144HzConfigurable RGB LED accents
Low accuracyLow resolution
GameSense not taken offRGB LED array isn’t very bright

Key Specification

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
BrandViewSonicBenQ
Model XG3240CEX3203R
Gaming MonitorYes CurvedYes Curved
WebcamNoNo
Weight with Stand6.28 kg8.1 kg
ColourBlackBlack
Dimension712.69 x 427.1 x 95.39 mm712.7 x 536.0 x 223.9 mm
Power Consumption41 W10 W

ViewSonic XG3240C

The design of the monitor looks sleek and modern with its small footprint and metallic legs helping it look great on your desk. But it does suffer in terms of ergonomics though. As the stand is only able to tilt up and down and the ports are located so far down on the back of the monitor that is actually pretty impossible to have a clean run of cables. And just have a general tidy looking desk port selection is very good though as HDMI DisplayPort DVI and VGA are all provided and if you do want to wall mount this or put it on a third party stand. You can via the visa standard well this thing does look very modern though.

The overall dimension of this monitor is 10.24 x 28.06 x 18.54 inches and it weighs around 21.3 pounds which seems quite heavy in terms of weight. But overall this monitor looks great in terms of design and build also good and sturdy but when it comes to the ergonomics is struggled on a very high level and basic things also they designed so badly like the ports are at the rear.

RELATED:  The Gigabyte FI27Q-P Frameless IPS Monitor

BenQ EX3203R

The design of the BenQ EX3203R is a lot less gamey it combines a gloss silver stand with black bezels in the front and a combination of black and silver in the back without any signs of RGB a design that wouldn’t look out of place in a professional environment as expected with a screen in this segment the stand is height adjustable and can be tilted but there is no swivel do keep in mind that if you want to vase a mounted you will need to get a separate kit for that that will cost you around 30 euros. The overall dimension of this monitor is 712.7 x 536.0 x 223.9 mm and it weighs around 8.1 Kgs. The overall design is pretty good and feels very gaming-focused design and the overall ergonomics and aesthetics of this monitor are good and everything is easily accessible.

Picture/Display

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Display TypeVA LCDVA LCD
Size31.5 inch31.5 inch
Dynamic Contrast Ratio120,000,000:120,000,000:1
TouchscreenNoNo
CurvedYes 1800R1800R
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Resolution2560 x 1440 pixel2560 x 1440 pixel
Pixel Density93 ppi93 ppi
Response Time3 ms (GtG)4 ms (MPRT)
Refresh Rate240 Hz144 Hz

ViewSonic XG3240C

The ViewSonicXG3240C is a 32-inch monitor that uses a VA curved panel with 144 Hertz refresh rates and it’s priced just over 300 pounds. And as such it offers plenty of value for those with a lower spec graphics card or a gaming console. Though there’s a massive issue with it which just isn’t very modern at all and that’s resolution as this is a 32-inch monitor that has a resolution of 1080p Full-HD which if that sounds disappointing to you then chances are you probably are not the target audience of this monitor. Because if you want to use this as a proper computer monitor you want to do spreadsheets productivity of any description really. Then it’s just not great at all as even the most modest of the general user will notice that there is pixelation around text and there’s just not very much detail. It’s certainly usable but you will never really enjoyed using it in stop having to sip this. Though it is a VA panel and the outright image quality isn’t actually too bad at all. Viewing angles are far from the best you’ve ever seen the contrast in color is fairly pleasing to the eye and it’s a big step up from a TN for sure.

RELATED:  Budget Buy: NIXEUS NX-EDG34S Ultrawide Monitor

Now gaming is arguably the best way to use this monitor and it has all the right technologies we mean it’s 144 Hertz it’s got free sync and it’s curved and large-sized are great for gaming. As long as you can get past the resolution for the right audience we don’t think it will be a concern as 1080p is very easy to drive even at 144 Hertz and the lower resolution is less noticeable than it would be on the desktop.

BenQ EX3203R

This is a 32-inch quad HD monitor that has 144 Hertz refresh rate. It is a curved VA panel with FreeSync to technology and HDR. So it sounds very similar to the other high-end monitors. A 32-inch monitor like this that has quad HD resolution has a pixel density of 93 and that is pretty much as sharp as a 24-inch screen with a full HD display would be. Now for most gamers and all-around users that are going to edit some pictures or edit a family video is going to be just fine actually. It’s going to be very nice but if you are a creative professional you are gonna miss a bit of sharpness. So you should get a screen that has a higher resolution for this size and a higher pixel density now from a gaming point of view.

However, 32 inches impressive and the larger size definitely adds to the immersion we do think it’s a bit too large. If you are serious about games where every millisecond counts but for the majority of other games we would say bigger is better also 1440p is still very reasonable to dry with a mid-range graphics card. Where 34-inch ultra-wide quad HD screen or larger 4k screens would require a more expensive GPU. Now we have to know that these larger VA panels, in general, are a bit slower than what you would expect from a typical TN gaming panel.

RELATED:  Compare: Asus TUF VG279QM vs Razer Raptor 27 Gaming Monitor

Connectivity

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
HDMI2.0 x 22.0 x 2
DisplayPort1.4 x 11.4 x 1
Audio Out-put3.5 mm3.5 mm
HDCPYesYes V2.2
USB3.0 x 4 downstream
3.0 x 1 upstream
Type-C x 1
RJ45NoNo
Built-in SpeakersYes 2 x 6 WNo
G-SYNC SupportNoNo
FreeSync SupportYesYes

ViewSonic XG3240C

Going towards the connectivity, it comes with two HDMI 2.0 ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, and more interestingly it also gets two audio jacks. Also, it got two 6W combined speakers including a 5W amplifier In terms of the USB connections there’s a quad-USB 3.0 hub, two at the rear of the monitor and two at the side for more comfortable access.

BenQ EX3203R

You get a DisplayPort connection and two HDMI connections in the back so that is enough for your PC and consoles as well as the USB type-c port the USB type-c port is great if you have a laptop you want to connect to it however with 10 watts of max power delivery you cannot charge your laptop with it, at the same time you also get a two-port USB hub and a 3.5-millimeter jack for your headset but what this screen doesn’t have is built-in speakers.

Power

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz100-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyExternalExternal
DC Input Power

In terms of power options, ViewSonic XG3240C requires a 7.4 x 5.1 x 12.5 DC connector and needed AC 100-240V 50/60Hz voltage and it consumes a 41W of power on the running mode. On the other hand, the BenQ EX3203R comes with a voltage rating of 100 – 240V and it also requires Power Consumption (sleep mode) 0.5W and Power Consumption (max) on running mode it requires power consumption of 100W.

Which is better!

The BenQ EX3203R remains a comparatively modern monitor. BenQ EX3203R gets an outstanding contrast ratio of 3000: 1. BenQ EX3203R holds a total input lag of 11 ms, which remains the best amongst the competition. Whereas on the other hand for the remarkably fast frame rates, the ViewSonic VX3258-2KC-MHD possesses a supreme refresh rate of 144 Hz that enables more lustrous gameplay.

Continue Reading

Compare