Logitech Anywhere 3 model almost exclusively through the prism of its class. Today we are comparing the Logitech MX Master 3 vs Logitech MX Anywhere 3.
Pros and Cons
|Logitech MX Master 3||Logitech MX Anywhere 3|
|Uninterrupted wireless operation||Uninterrupted wireless operation|
|Superb rated battery life||Incredible scroll wheel|
|Super-sleek design||Excellent battery life|
|Pretty expensive||Nonspecific DPI adjustment|
|Logitech MX Master 3||Logitech MX Anywhere 3|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Type||Gamer Mouse||Gamer Mouse|
|Dimension||124.9 x 83.4 x 51 mm||100.5 x 65 x 34.4 mm|
|Connectivity||USB Type-C||USB Type-C|
|DPI range||4000 DPI||4000 DPI|
|Colors||Black||Pale gray, Graphite, Pink|
|Weight||141 grams||99 g|
|Software||Logitech Options +||Logitech Options +|
|Supported OS||Linux, Mac, Windows, iPadOS||Linux, Mac, Windows, iPadOS|
Logitech MX Master 3- is available on the market in two color versions – gray and graphite. The design has been quite noticeably refreshed, although it is difficult to talk about a revolution here. Especially that a similar stylistic procedure was decided not only on the Logitech MX Anywhere 3 model but also on the Logitech MX Vertical – characteristically undulating makes the shape a bit more attractive and improves the grip.
Logitech began to use completely different materials. Interestingly, the mouse is made in an extremely different convention than Logitech MX Anywhere 3 . Almost the entire body is made of a matte, rubberized material that is very pleasant to hold. However, it is not “velvety,” but a bit rougher. This improves the grip – the hand does not slip on the mouse to control it quite comfortably.
However, attention is drawn to the manufacturer’s decision to use a different material to make the mouse buttons themselves. Maybe it is a good decision from the usability side, but visually, it takes away a lot from the reviewed model. The buttons themselves stand out quite clearly from the rest of the device – they are different to the touch and reflect light differently and have a slightly different color. Interestingly, a similar procedure was used in the case of the MX Master 2S model. Still, the fit of the materials was much better, and the difference was much less noticeable.
Logitech MX Master 3 still looks great after more than a month; there is no tendency to collect our hands or other dirt traces. The joints between the materials are either located in natural places or made perfectly, so you can not have any objections to the finish of this model.
The steel feeling that the wheels give us definitely reminds us of a top-shelf rodent in our hands and gives the device a bit of luxurious elegance.
Looking at the bottom of the mice, we can see slippers, of course, drawing mercilessly. As in the case of the Anywhere family, the fact that in the “3” generation, the sliders’ surface is smaller than in the “2s” generation. You cannot feel any difference from the functional side.
Logitech MX Anywhere 3- is available in three color variants – pale gray, graphite, and pink. Logitech MX Anywhere 3 is, as intended, a small mouse, symmetrical and not well suited to the hand – anyway, it is difficult to use it in a grip other than a fingertip grip. Therefore, it cannot be treated as an ergonomic mouse.
The design has been slightly refreshed, and the characteristic triangles have been replaced by … a rubber wave? The mouse is pleasant to hold in hand, and this profiling improves the grip, but the style of its predecessor (not only because of the color). Nevertheless, the overall impression of the Logitech MX Anywhere 3 design is subtle?
The manufacturer gave up the characteristic frames surrounding the device and opted for something much more uniform, although there are silver inserts here and there. Anyway, see for yourself how Logitech MX Anywhere 3 looks compared to its predecessor.
Let us draw your attention to the fact that the plastic is a bit different – more matte and slightly rubberized. Not even fully rubberized, but more… delicate, velvety? It is hard to put into words, but this subtle change is worth noting as a plus.
The plastic looks very good, and it hardly collects fingerprints at all – the color, unfortunately, makes all dirt particles visible at once. The metal mouse wheel adds the premium feel – not only is it good to use, but for some reason, the feeling of steel cold always reminds us that we use a top-shelf mouse.
After a few weeks, basically, the only element that shows any signs of wear are the sliders. In fact, these did not hurt too much, but I noticed that they are much smaller than those used in the MX Anywhere 2S model. The mouse, however, has a perfect glide on almost any surface, so it is difficult to treat it as a trick – rather a comparative observation.
The Logitech Options + software itself is still in beta, and not all functions are implemented. A list of those that are missing from the “regular” Logitech Options, you can find here – but the manufacturer himself assures that they will appear over time.
Options + has been visually refreshed – interestingly, the manufacturer offers both a light and a dark theme. Logitech Options has always been famous for these models. The mouse offers us all kinds of gestures that we trigger by default after pressing the thumb support; we can also use Logitech Flow, i.e., operating several computers simultaneously.
Logitech MX Master 3- If you do not currently have a functional mouse or it breaks down, it is better to reach for the MX Master 3 model because it does not lack its predecessor, and it adds a lot of new ones. However, if you have the MX Master 2s model, then… feelings gallop towards the ambivalent ones.
Honestly – if the MagSpeed wheel offered this functionality, which in the case of the MX Anywhere 3 model, the accumulation of advantages would make me recommend a change with a clear conscience.
It’s not that the MX Master 3 adds any flaw – what is it? Not. Refreshed design, slightly better build quality, USB Type-C socket instead of micro-USB, still better mouse wheel.
Logitech MX Anywhere 3- After all, it cannot deny that MX Anywhere 3 is a certain evolution from its predecessor. The design has been refreshed a bit (or for the better – disputable issues), the plastic used seems to be a bit nicer, the whole thing is better balanced, the micro USB socket has been replaced with a newer USB Type C (finally!), And the wheel has become a very modern and gadget creation. There was a small disadvantage in exchange for all these advantages – the inability to tilt the mouse wheel for many can be painful.
All the nice evolutions (and one step back) make it difficult to judge the Logitech MX Anywhere 3 differently than the Logitech MX Anywhere 2s model. Both mice are slightly different, but as a rule, we are dealing with a newer, slightly improved evolution of an excellent model.
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Optical Gaming Mouse Review
Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA is the latest addition to the Corsair mouse stable. This model is also a real concentrate of technology, designed for those looking for something heavier (precisely concerning weight) than those that Corsair has recently launched. But weight isn’t the only detail that catches the eye.
|Excellent build quality||Stiff cable|
|8 programmable buttons||Expensive|
|Up to 8,000 Hz of Polling Rate|
|26K DPI sensor|
Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA is a mouse with extremely peculiar shapes. Its structure is designed only for right-handed users since both the programmable buttons and the side shapes are precisely designed for use with the right hand. However, a form factor that fans of the brand and the M series will recognize and appreciate.
|Corsair M65 RGB Ultra|
|Dimension||117 x 77 x 39 mm|
|Sensor||Optical OMRON Switches|
|Sensor Model||CORSAIR MARKSMAN|
|Polling Rate||Up to 8,000 Hz|
|Connectivity||Wired USB-A 2.0|
|Battery type||Lithium-ion polymer|
|Battery life||Up to 120 hours|
|Software||CORSAIR iCUE software|
The M60 model made its debut in 2011, 10 years ago. From the first minutes, however, the hand, at least ours, is at ease. Each finger finds its place, and even those who use the artisan grip will have no problems of any kind. It may be a little lower than we would have expected, but we did not encounter any fatigue or other issues related to prolonged use. As usual, the device accompanied us for several days, not only in gaming use but also in work, to allow us prolonged tests involving the use of software and video games.
Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA hides many other essential features. The body below, which glimpses out from the front and back, is in aluminum. The resistance of the product is therefore out of the question. The upper layer is made of plastic, pleasant to the touch, and not too smooth, just enough to guarantee a sufficient grip. To increase the grip, there are also the lateral knurls where the thumb and little finger rest.
As mentioned in the introduction, Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA is a mouse that boasts, unlike the many coming on the market lately (as well as Corsair’s Saber PRO RGB Wireless ), a weight that can even exceed 100 grams. It weighs 97 grams, but in the back, the one that houses the sensor, so to speak, it is possible to insert three additional weights that allow you to go up to 115 grams. The peculiarity then is not only the fact of inserting these three weights but also arranging them differently or using only one or two of them to create one’s balance. And the way to balance the mouse is also helpful for another feature that we will discover shortly.
There are two more programmable buttons before the mouse wheel, useful for cycling between DPI configurations. The wheel is huge and has a “tire” style cover that guarantees excellent grip. The feedback of the button integrated in the wheel itself is more than discreet. A few technical hints before continuing further. The main buttons are the CORSAIR QUICKSTRIKE that we had already appreciated in the SABER PRO RGB Wireless review combined with switches OMRON optics , designed to guarantee a practically instantaneous speed of implementation. The two buttons can be pressed along their entire structure. The smoothness of the mouse is guaranteed by 4 classic PTFE feet that follow the particular structure of the aluminum body.
Here we have the wired variant of Corsair’s new M65 RGB ULTRA. Also, in this case, we are dealing with a long cable (1.8 meters) in Paracord. It’s like not having it. The cable runs smoothly over the mat or surface where you would usually use the mouse without hindrance. Indeed, it is precisely the presence of the cable that allows a polling rate 8 times higher than that of most gaming mice. Usually, due to the reviews, we alternate the use of wireless mice with wired ones. We assure you that the transition to those with Corsair Paracord cable is painless.
The Corsair AXON Hyper-Processing proprietary technology allows the achievement of the 8,000 Hz polling rate (the same reached by the wired version of the wired SABER PRO ). But be careful: the 8,000 Hz mode can only be activated by the iCUE software and only if you have sufficiently performing hardware. Thanks to the Corsair MARKSMAN proprietary sensor, 26,000 DPI of sensitivity can be reached, an exaggeratedly high value that you will hardly find yourself exploiting. What matters is that the sensitivity can be increased by 1 DPI at a time, allowing, obviously again via iCUE, to see your reference values (even for the Sniper button).
The weight balance of the mouse is also linked to another feature of the M65 ULTRA. Among the many integrated hardware improvements, there is also the so-called Sensor Fusion Control, which integrates a 6-axis accelerometer and gyroscope. The two sensors have a dual purpose: the first is to improve the tracking of the repositioning of the mouse in case you lift it from the surface; the second is to allow you to match the functions of the mouse to the inclinations. Also, from iCUE, it is possible to calibrate inclination of 20, 30, or more degrees towards one of the 4 directions (left, right, front, back) and match these inclinations to specific functions. For example, you could make tilting the mouse 20 degrees to make the system respond as if the user were pressing the V key on the keyboard. You can even match whole text strings, maybe a specific message to send in the game chat.
A feature that is particularly difficult to find in other mice adds to the already excellent hardware equipment available to this M65 RGB ULTRA. When we said that it is a real concentrate of technology, we were not joking at all. An obligatory mention also to LED lighting. Since, in this case, Corsair did not have to spare itself to keep the weight within particularly low thresholds, many more LEDs have been integrated, which contributes to making the mouse even more aggressive and iconic.
Without CORSAIR iCUE software, you do not have access to most of the top features of the mouse in question. We still find it a bit immature and complicated. Still, if nothing else, connecting M65 ULTRA and opening iCUE, you are greeted by a series of tutorials that explain step by step how to set, for example, the functions related to the inclination, how to assign new keys, and how to manage the lighting. The process to calibrate the mouse on the surface of use is also very useful, an essential step to use M65 ULTRA to the best of its possibilities.
Corsair M65 RGB ULTRA is one of those mice that, at first glance, might seem almost niche. The truth is, it’s effortless to fall in love with it. Under the fine aluminum body hides the best of Corsair’s proprietary hardware, which allows access to some particularly original features and, in some cases, really comfortable.
The SNIPER button will delight shooter lovers, as well as the 26,000 DPI sensor that allows sensitivity shots of 1 DPI at a time. However, note that not everyone needs so many options, programmable keys, and such high performance. The price is not affordable for all budgets, especially if you want to opt for the wireless model. But know that the wired gets along great.
Steelseries Aerox 3 vs Aerox 3 Wireless: Light Weight Mouse
Steelseries Aerox 3 and Aerox 3 Wireless are two almost perfect mice that combine suitable sensors with the high build quality. However, they have a notable problem that can be crucial.
Pros and Cons
|Aerox 3||Aerox 3 Wireless|
|Awesome build quality||Awesome build quality|
|Griffy surface||Griffy surface|
|Good click||Good click|
|Slightly stiff cable||Weak battery life|
Steelseries Aerox 3 and Aerox 3 Wireless are identical in both exterior and use. We have a lot to write about Aerox 3 and the features that make them stand out in the market. However, both fall on the finish line due to a simple detail that we usually take for granted: the feet are too thin, which leads to the chassis rubbing in soft mouse pads if we are not very light with the hand. With better feet, Aerox 3 would have been a given recommendation in Mouse Guide.
- TTC Golden Micro switch instinctively tactile click
- Flawless TrueMove sensors
- Well-balanced shape and ambidextrous
- Size: medium
- Suitable for most grips
- Well built
|Aerox 3||Aerox 3 Wireless|
|$||CHECK PRICE||CHECK PRICE|
|Button||85 g||95 g|
|Weight||61 g||68 g|
|Dimension||120.5 x 57.91 x 21.53 mm||120.5 x 57.91 x 21.53 mm|
|Sensor||Optical (LED)||Optical (LED)|
|Sensor Model||TrueMove Core||TrueMove Air|
|Polling Rate||1000 Hz||1000 Hz|
|Battery Type||No Batteries||Rechargeable|
|Software||SteelSeries Engine 3||SteelSeries Engine 3|
|Compatibility||Windows, Mac||Windows, Mac|
Both variants Aerox 3, are identical in appearance, down to millimetres in dimensions. For that reason, we will describe Aerox 3 and Aerox 3 Wireless together in the future, provided that there are no differences between them.
Aerox 3 has a stylish and symmetrical design with a tasteful accent in the logo on the left mouse button. In true super-light fashion, most of the top and bottom of the mouse is equipped with diamond-patterned holes to trim down the weight.
Aerox 3 is relatively neutral in its form and is suitable for more hands than, for example, the competitor Superlight from Logitech. There are no aggressive features in the case. It is neither high nor low, the click is not too hollow or too flat, and it is neither too long nor short. The sides are also almost straight except for the bottom curve. Steelseries markets the mouse for claw and fingertip grips, but our tests have no problems with palm grips. Thus, we see that the vast majority of hands can find a comfortable grip.
From a construction quality perspective, we have nothing to complain about. Aerox 3 is a robust mouse that is rattle-free and crack-free when we hug it. Despite a Bluetooth module in the rear half of the wireless variant, the weight is evenly distributed when we hold it in the middle with the index finger and thumb tips.
The mouse has an unusually grainy surface texture that is not comparable to other mice we have tested so far. Most matte mice usually have a fine-grained or smooth texture, but Aerox 3 has unusually coarse grains. This is not sandpaper or discomfort when used. We have no preference and do not mind the slightly coarser grains, and for those users who want a grippy mouse, Aerox 3 can be a good choice.
So far, it has been a top-class mouse, but unfortunately, it falls entirely on one detail. The feet are so thin and the surface so small that if we rest our hand on the mouse, it starts scratching on soft mousepads. The problem is challenging to fix on your own with aftermarket feet because the sensor has a compact lifting length. It leaves the option of sanding down the bottom of the mouse, something we should never even have to think about in the premium segment. The material is PTFE, but Steelseries does not claim that they are made of pure Teflon, unlike many competitors in the market.
If you are looking for a wireless mouse but went for the Logitech G Pro X Superlight due to the lack of LEDs, Aerox 3 may be a good option. In addition to a LED diffuser at the bottom, light also leaks through the chassis. We guess that the diffuser is made of the popular material polycarbonate and that the bottom has a cut-out to let the light through. In actual use, the light nicely reflects in our mouse pad via the light loops.
The cable is too stiff for our taste. It is still far better than a standard rubber hose cable, as in the Logitech Superlight. In both Superlights and Aerox 3 Wireless cases, the mice escape criticism as they are intended to be used wirelessly. Aerox 3 uses at least one USB-C port, making it easy to switch to an aftermarket cable, a feature that Superlight does not share.
According to the specifications, the battery life is up to 200 hours during constant use, emphasising “up to”. We have a hard time getting a charge to last 50 hours. Compared to the Logitech G Pro X Superlight, which we could use for several weeks without charging, we can make the Aerox 3 Wireless live for about four to five days with equivalent use. Fortunately, the mouse is fully charged in about 45 minutes.
Aerox 3 weighs 58 grams, and 68 Aerox 3 Wireless weighs 68 grams, 1 gram more than the official specifications.
It is always interesting and exciting to test mice that do not use the otherwise popular Omron switches. There is nothing wrong with Omron switches but a slight variation does not hurt. Aerox 3 uses TTC Golden Microswitches.
The switch’s weight feels noticeably heavier than the popular Chinese Omron D2FC-F switches, which abounds on today’s market. They are also more tactile, which emphasizes the importance but results in a crispier click. In terms of sound, they are much louder than Omron switches, while the sound is louder. In summary, the controls are of a high class and are an excellent alternative to Omron switches for the user who wants a more distinct tactile feel.
The scroll wheel sits low and has a tactile click, well-defined steps and is relatively loud. We prefer this type of scroll wheel compared to those higher up and have slightly spongier measures. In this case, we can compromise on the sound level.
The side buttons are also distinctly tactile, but they are narrow. The narrow design can make it difficult to feel the small space between the front and back side buttons. Despite this, we have not encountered any problems where we accidentally press the wrong side button. It is still good to know if you prefer side buttons with a larger and broader area.
We have always disliked having CPI control buttons on the top of the mouse. We do not see any scenarios where we often need to change CPI and therefore prefer to have these at the bottom of the mouse, where we never happen to access them by mistake. That said, the CPI slider is of unusually high quality. It is usually a forgotten detail, which results in a spongy click, but in Aerox 3, it is a highly tactile and qualitative click.
Today’s high-performance sensors are usually identical. Performance rarely differs in actual usage scenarios. What can distinguish high-performance sensors is often related to small posts on specification sheets. Sometimes there are manufacturer adaptations of market-leading sensors that are worth keeping an eye on. The impressive thing for us is if there are any deviations. In this segment, the focus is less on sensors. It would help if you instead chose mouse by mouse shape.
Aerox 3 uses the SteelSeries TrueMove Core sensor, while Aerox 3 has TrueMove Air. Interestingly, they do not share the sensor. In terms of specification sheets, TrueMove Air is the better sensor. In actual use, today’s sensors are so good that we do not notice any difference.
We have nothing to complain about other than that the lifting length is slightly shorter than, for example, PixArt sensors, which may explain why the feet are so thin. In our opinion, a quick lifting length is not negative, provided that the feet that the mouse is equipped with do not need to be upgraded.
We use MouseTester 1.5 to collect sensor data. We then review the results for any deviations. We find no traces of the common culprits in today’s mice, which inferior sensors have difficulty with: namely, Angle snapping, jitter and other compensations.
CPI – counts per inch
Manufacturers always have self-specified tolerances to adhere to. This means that the stated CPI does not always correspond to what the consumer expects. There is a built-in calibration for CPI in Mouse tests where we give the mouse a specific length and get back a number. The returned number should correspond to the set CPI on the mouse.
Jitter means that the motion tracking is inconsistent. We test it by moving the mouse diagonally and slowly to see if a step is formed instead of a soft line.
Some mice may have difficulty tracking fast movements correctly. We move the mouse quickly over a surface and note the speed curve on the result. The result should not be zero or have unexpected consequences.
By drawing fast circles with the mouse, we can see if it catches up or falls back and begins to compensate by drawing straight lines.
Players with low mouse sensitivity may need to lift and reposition the mouse during active play. Therefore, it is essential that the mouse has a short lifting length and stops reading movements almost immediately. We use actual user scenarios when we test lift size because it is difficult to get exact numbers.
We must always consider the human factor in this type of test. MouseTester can provide data to go on if we feel that something is not quite right. However, they are not absolute. What counts in the end is how the sensor performs and how it is experienced during actual use.
Aerox 3 uses the Steelseries Engine 3 software, which has expected features. These are macros, adjusted CPI and various LED functions. What shines with its absence is an adjustment of the lifting length.
Two features that we recommend to stay away from are Angle snapping and acceleration settings. The Angle snapping setting locks the pointer according to the grid and follows them instead of letting us point freely and precisely. The acceleration settings create lag. During specific movements, the lead slows down or increases in speed without corresponding to our actual mouse movement.
Steelseries Engine 3 is relatively resource-efficient and does not need to run after the settings are configured.
The SteelSeries Aerox 3 and the Aerox 3 Wireless features a different sensor than the wireless version. The Wireless has a considerably greater CPI range and a shorter lift-off distance, which results in fewer unwanted movements while moving the mouse. Despite having an internal battery, it is only slightly heavier than the cable version. Its wireless connection and multi-device pairing capabilities make it more suitable for usage in the office and on the go. The Wired features less click latency and higher build quality.
Trust BAYO Ergo Wireless Vertical Mouse With RGB Light
The Trust brand, identified with gaming equipment, decided to try its hand at the ergonomic mouse market, and this is how the Trust Bay model was created. It has RGB lighting. So let’s check what the company has prepared for us because it has prepared quite a lot of good things on paper.
|Comfortable to use||Not suitable for left-handed|
|Neat and resistant design||The battery cannot be replaced|
|RGB light on the thumb rest|
|Good button response|
The Trust has recently undergone a small image change because the usually black and red packaging, of course, heralding gaming equipment, has now been replaced by white and orange.
However, apart from the visual issue, a simple cardboard box with a front render, corresponding to the size of the product itself, has a lot of goodness in it. A lot, because in addition to a mouse and papers wrapped in foil, we get a tiny 2.4 GHz USB receiver and a more than 80 centimeters long USB-A to USB-C cable. Unfortunately, it is only used for charging because Trust Bayo does not support wired mode.
- Unknown optical sensor
- Sensitivity on 5 levels: 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400 DPI
- Main switches: Huano with 20 million click durability
- Number of buttons: 5 + scroll wheel
- Interface: wireless via 2.4 GHz USB receiver
- Built-in rechargeable battery
- USB refresh: 125, 250, 500 and 1000Hz
- RGB backlight on the base
- Warranty: 2 years
|Trust BAYO Ergo Wireless Mouse|
|Dimension||109 x 70 x 83 mm|
|Sensor Model||Miniature sensor|
|Connectivity||Wireless USB receiver|
|Compatibility||Windows 10, Windows 11, macOS|
The Bayo Trust doesn’t discover America, to be honest. The manufacturer focused on the traditional shape of this type of mice, shortening the casing a bit so that my larger hand does not fit perfectly on it because the fingertips “go beyond the main buttons. However, this is not a product defect, and my private problem is that smaller hands (especially feminine) will find themselves on the Trust Bayo body without any problem.
Speaking of the shape, the Trust opted for a five-element housing, combining individual parts in such a terrible way that the gaps between the plastics created will be dreamed up long after nights for me. Especially that the plastic used, although quite pleasant to the touch, is not of the highest quality and gets dirty quickly, which is not a problem in the case of the gray material that builds the buttons. There, the material makes a much better impression, and together with a modest insert on the base, it also improves the overall visual aspect of the Bayo model.
However, it is difficult to call this mouse a work of art, but you cannot be tempted to say that it is badly designed. The flaws in its design are economical, and all because Trust Bayo combines wireless mode, an unusual housing format, full mouse capabilities, a modern USB-C connector, and a built-in battery. In other words, keeping the price below $40, the manufacturer had to save and fell on the materials used, the production process, and the optical sensor of unknown origin.
It is a pity that at the same time, Trust added a simple RGB backlight to the model, straining the budget on the mouse and functionally fulfilling only the role of a warning about the low battery. This backlight may not look bad, but it stings the eyes a bit because it is not only there but also significantly complicates the base of the mouse. It includes a sensor and a simple on/off switch with an additional mode that turns on the backlight and the button itself to change the backlight mode.
Simple sliders complement the whole with (interestingly) rounded edges and a gap for a USB receiver. However, do not try to pull it out with your fingers; there is no need – just hit the mouse lightly on your hand in the air, and the receiver will “fly-out” by itself.
While unusual, the Trust Bayo features a traditional set of buttons (two main, two sides, roller), completed by around a simple button on the spine to change the sensitivity. These buttons work. on average, but there is nothing to be bothered about because they will be perfect for office use. Especially since their arrangement for smaller hands will not be any problem during work.
The manufacturer does not mention something officially and broadly in the presentation of the product, it is a disadvantage. In Trust Bayo, this something is an unknown optical sensor, which due to the lack of software, is doomed to operate at the levels of 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, and 2400 DPI. We change these levels using a dedicated button on the back, and as far as precision is concerned, it’s wrong. So bad that even the software was unable to make the appropriate measurements because of the signal inconsistency.
Trust Bayo is tormented by a whole inventory of known errors in the operation of sensors in mice, ranging from increased prediction, interpolation, and high-frequency jittering at the level of 800 DPI, as well as negative and positive acceleration. In general, therefore, playing games with Bayo that require precision is a chore, and working on tasks requiring precision should not be a special problem in office applications.
A wireless vertical mouse for under $40 should immediately light a red lamp in our heads. However, this does not mean that Trust Bayo is a completely useless model that will not find a niche for itself. This mouse is designed to work for those who suffer from wrist pains when using standard “flat” models. It may not be the best made, its materials could have been better, and the sensor could be more precise, but by choosing this model, you get wireless equipment with a built-in battery, and if you are looking for these two features at this price, Bayo will be a good choice.
Top2gadget is user-supported. We may receive a commission for purchases made.
1MORE ComfoBuds Pro Review: Affordably ANC
The ComfoBuds Pro, 1More is now delivering a design change towards a full-fledged in-ear. And although the two earbuds are...
OneOdio Studio Pro C Wireless Review: Affordable
We haven’t heard from OneOdio for a long time after the grand debut on our site. Then came the Super...
What Is Aptx Audio Codec
The popularity of headphones raises the question for users of which models are better to choose and how they generally...
How To Bluetooth Works
Bluetooth or bluetooth (translated as blue tooth) is a technology for wireless data transmission . Bluetooth enables the exchange of...
Best Smartwatches for Seniors
Smartwatches and bracelets are convenient, and most importantly, handy gadgets that allow you to monitor your health effectively. They can...
Razer Kraken V3 X vs Razer Blackshark V2 Pro: Which is Better
The choice of high-quality, functional, and technological gaming headphones is not an easy task. And if you have to choose...
Fitbit Charge 5 vs Fitbit Charge 4: Which is Better
After a series of leaks, Fitbit has announced a new generation of Fitbit Charge 5 fitness bracelets. This is the...
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Apple Watch Series 7: Which is Better
The Apple Watch Series 7 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, two advanced smartwatches with much to offer, now face each...
Amazfit GTR 3 Pro vs Amazfit GTR 3: Premium Smartwatch Comparision
The Amazfit GTR 3, the GTR 3 Pro, and the GTS 3 are already the third generation of the successful...
Ticwatch 3 Pro Ultra vs TicWatch Pro 3: Should You Upgrade?
Mobvoi has presented the new Ticwatch 3 Pro Ultra, which is now certified according to military standards; it also brings...
Difference Between: Gaming Chairs vs Office Chairs
Anyone who plays computer games on their gaming laptop, powerful gaming desktop computer, PlayStation, or Xbox game console, sooner or...
Bose QuietComfort 45 Wireless Noise Cancelling Headset Review
Bose was once almost synonymous with the best active noise cancellation you could find. Now Bose is finally ready with...
WEARABLES2 months ago
Coros Vertix 2 vs Coros Vertix: Adventure GPS Watch
AUDIO3 months ago
Redmi AirDots 3 Pro vs Redmi AirDots 3: True Wireless Earbuds
TABLETS1 month ago
2021 Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6: Tablet For Your Daily Needs
WEARABLES2 months ago
Huawei Watch 3 Pro: Smartwatch With Harmony OS
AUDIO2 months ago
Nothing Ear (1) vs AirPods Pro: Earbuds Comparision
WEARABLES4 weeks ago
Fitbit Charge 5 Review: Connected Bracelet with ECG
WEARABLES2 months ago
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 3
AUDIO3 months ago
True Wireless Headphones: Bowers & Wilkins PI5 vs PI7