Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 265: The Garmin Venu 3 and Forerunner 265 are both excellent choices for those looking for fitness-focused smartwatches. They share many similarities, such as their AMOLED touchscreens, health and recovery feedback, and the same asking price. However, they also have several key differences that set them apart.
Pros and Cons
| Garmin Venu 3 | Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|
| Sleek and modern design | Durable, typical Garmin sports watch design |
| Stunning AMOLED display | Bright, crisp AMOLED visuals |
| Gorilla Glass 3 and stainless steel bezel | Reinforced polymer case |
| HFV/HIV status, sleep coach | Comprehensive metrics for runners |
| Accurate single-band GPS | Precise, highly configurable GPS |
| Consistent and smooth readings | Run button easier to use with gloves |
| Uses single-band GPS | No wireless charging |
| Same price as Forerunner 265 | Same price as Venu 3 |
Specifications
| VENU 3 | Forerunner 265 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Garmin | Garmin |
| Released | Aug 30, 2023 | May 2, 2023 |
| Display | 1.34 inches | 1.3 inches |
| Resolution | 454 x 454 pixels | 416 x 416 pixels |
| Dimensions | 45 x 45x 12mm | 41.7 x 41.7 x 12.9mm |
| Weight | 47g | 47g |
| Build: | Stainless steel, polymer, silicone | Fibre-reinforced polymer |
| Battery Life: | 14 days (smartwatch), 26 days (saver), 11 hrs (GNSS+music) | 13 days (20 hours GPS) |
| IP Rating: | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Device storage | 8 GB | 8GB |
| NFC Payments | Garmin Pay | Garmin Pay |
| Sensors: | Elevate, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, etc. | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, SATIQ |
| Connectivity: | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi |
| Compatibility: | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| Garmin Pay: | Yes | Yes |
| Features: | Calls, Assistant, Notifications, etc. | Calls, Assistant, Notifications, etc. |
| Speaker | In-built | In-built |
| Microphone | In-built | In-built |
| Price | $449.99 | $449.99 |
Design & Build
The Venu 3 leans more towards the smartwatch side with a classic look and a stainless steel bezel. In contrast, the Forerunner 265 is more sports-focused, evident in its sportier look and plastic bezel.
The Venu 3 comes with a sleek design, boasting a 45 mm classic black model. The watch is lightweight, weighing around 46 grams, strap included.
The Venu 3’s display is made of Gorilla Glass 3, ensuring durability. The bezel is crafted from stainless steel, and the back features the Elevate Generation 5 sensor.
The Forerunner 265 has a typical Garmin sports watch design, emphasizing durability and functionality.
This model is made of a reinforced polymer case. The back houses the evolved Elevate sensor. Unlike the Venu 3, the Forerunner 265 has five buttons for navigation.
Display: Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 265
While both watches have similar displays, the Venu 3 boasts a slightly larger screen, offering a better viewing experience.
The Venu 3 boasts a stunning AMOLED display, which is clear and easy to read, even under bright sunlight.
The Forerunner 265 features a 1.3-inch AMOLED screen with a resolution of 416 by 416 pixels. It’s bright and backlit, ensuring clarity during outdoor activities.
Buttons & Navigation
The Forerunner 265 offers more flexibility with its five-button configuration, allowing users to navigate the watch without relying solely on the touchscreen. This can be particularly useful during workouts when hands might be sweaty. On the other hand, the Venu 3 has three buttons, with one dedicated to accessing the voice assistant on your smartphone.
Voice Assistant & Calls: A significant advantage of the Venu 3 is its ability to access the voice assistant on your smartphone and take calls directly from the watch, thanks to its built-in microphone and speaker.
Text Messages: Both watches allow users to receive text notifications. However, the Venu 3 takes it a step further by allowing Android users to type out custom message replies using an on-screen keyboard.
Sleep Tracking: Both watches offer sleep tracking, but the Venu 3 has the added benefit of tracking naps and providing a sleep coach feature, giving users more insights into their sleep patterns.
Training Feedback: For those serious about their training, the Forerunner 265 offers more advanced feedback, including training load, training effect, and a unique training readiness feature.
Running Data: The Forerunner 265 stands out with its ability to provide more advanced running data, such as ground contact time, vertical oscillation, and running power.
External Sensors: The Forerunner 265 can pair with more external sensors, offering users more data and insights into their workouts.
Navigation: When it comes to navigation, the Forerunner 265 offers breadcrumb style routing and the ability to load in routes, providing users with more detailed navigation options.
Similar Features:
The Venu 3 is packed with features like the HFV or HIV status, previously exclusive to other Garmin series. It also offers a sleep coach feature, providing sleep recommendations. The touchscreen, while modern, can be tricky to use during activities.
The Forerunner 265 is tailored for both amateur and serious runners. It measures VO2 Max, training load, heart rate variability status, and more. It also supports a range of sports and activities, from running and cycling to yoga and pilates.
- Fitness Focus: Both are fitness-focused smartwatches.
- Display: Both have AMOLED touchscreens.
- Price: Both have the same asking price.
- Health & Recovery Feedback: Both provide extensive health and recovery feedback.
- Size Options: Both come in two different sizes.
- Durability: Both have a 5 ATM water resistance rating and use Gorilla Glass 3 for the displays.
- Smartwatch Features: Both can store offline music, have Garmin pay for contactless payments, sync weather information, and display events from your calendar.
- Battery Life: Both offer similar battery life ranging from 10-14 days without always-on display and 3.5-5 days with it.
- Health Tracking: Both can track heart rate, blood oxygen saturation levels, stress levels, respiration rate, steps, floors climbed, calories burned, intensity minutes, and body battery.
Differences: Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 265
- Design & Build: Venu 3 has a more classic look with a stainless steel bezel, while Forerunner 265 has a sportier look with a plastic bezel.
- Display Size & Resolution: Venu 3 has a slightly larger display than the Forerunner 265.
- Buttons: Forerunner 265 has a five-button configuration, while Venu 3 has three.
- Voice Assistant: Only Venu 3 can access the voice assistant on your smartphone.
- Calls: Venu 3 can take calls using its built-in microphone and speaker.
- Text Messages: Venu 3 allows for custom message replies using an on-screen keyboard.
- Advanced Sleep Tracking: Venu 3 can track naps and offers a sleep coach feature.
- Training Feedback: Forerunner 265 provides more advanced training feedback.
- Running Data: Forerunner 265 offers more advanced running data.
- External Sensors: Forerunner 265 can pair with more external sensors.
- Navigation: Forerunner 265 offers breadcrumb style routing and can load in routes for navigation.
Conclusion: Garmin Venu 3 vs Forerunner 265
Choosing between the Garmin Venu 3 and the Forerunner 265 boils down to personal preference. If you’re looking for a sleek design with a modern touchscreen, the Venu 3 might be for you. However, if you’re an athlete or runner seeking a watch with a plethora of metrics and features, the Forerunner 265 is a fantastic choice. Both watches are top-notch, ensuring that whichever you choose, you’re getting a quality product.
