Comparision Between: ViewSonic XG3240C vs BenQ EX3203R

ViewSonic XG3240C vs BenQ EX3203R

Here we back again with another interesting comparison for guys. Today we have two gaming monitors that come with the same size of 32 inches. ViewSonic and BenQ are the two brands which are generally known for their value for money products and we expect the same thing from these two monitors. So we will compare ViewSonic XG3240C and BenQ EX3203R to which one is better for your choices.

ViewSonic XG3240C Screen BenQ EX3203R Rear

Pros and Cons

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Great gaming featuresAmazing smooth 165 Hz panel
Excellent RGB lighting system.FreeSync 2 and G-Sync
Backlight strobe option up to 144HzConfigurable RGB LED accents
Low accuracyLow resolution
GameSense has not taken offRGB LED array isn’t very bright

Key Specification

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
CHECK PRICECHECK PRICE
BrandViewSonicBenQ
Model XG3240CEX3203R
Gaming MonitorYes CurvedYes Curved
WebcamNoNo
Weight with Stand6.28 kg8.1 kg
ColourBlackBlack
Dimension712.69 x 427.1 x 95.39 mm712.7 x 536.0 x 223.9 mm
Power Consumption41 W10 W

ViewSonic XG3240C

The design of the monitor looks sleek and modern with its small footprint and metallic legs helping it look great on your desk. But it does suffer in terms of ergonomics though. As the stand is only able to tilt up and down and the ports are located so far down on the back of the monitor that is actually pretty impossible to have a clean run of cables. And just have a general tidy looking desk port selection is very good though as HDMI DisplayPort DVI and VGA are all provided and if you do want to wall mount this or put it on a third party stand. You can via the visa standard well this thing does look very modern though.

The overall dimension of this monitor is 10.24 x 28.06 x 18.54 inches and it weighs around 21.3 pounds which seems quite heavy in terms of weight. But overall this monitor looks great in terms of design and build also good and sturdy but when it comes to the ergonomics is struggled on a very high level and basic things also they designed so badly like the ports are at the rear.

RELATED:  Dell C3422WE vs Philips P-line 346P1CRH: Curved Monitor Comparision

BenQ EX3203R

The design of the BenQ EX3203R is a lot less gamey it combines a gloss silver stand with black bezels in the front and a combination of black and silver in the back without any signs of RGB a design that wouldn’t look out of place in a professional environment as expected with a screen in this segment the stand is height adjustable and can be tilted but there is no swivel do keep in mind that if you want to vase a mounted you will need to get a separate kit for that that will cost you around 30 euros. The overall dimension of this monitor is 712.7 x 536.0 x 223.9 mm and it weighs around 8.1 Kgs. The overall design is pretty good and feels very gaming-focused design and the overall ergonomics and aesthetics of this monitor are good and everything is easily accessible.

Picture/Display

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Display TypeVA LCDVA LCD
Size31.5 inch31.5 inch
Dynamic Contrast Ratio120,000,000:120,000,000:1
TouchscreenNoNo
CurvedYes 1800R1800R
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Resolution2560 x 1440 pixel2560 x 1440 pixel
Pixel Density93 PPI93 PPI
Response Time3 ms (GtG)4 ms (MPRT)
Refresh Rate240 Hz144 Hz

ViewSonic XG3240C

ViewSonic XG3240C

The ViewSonicXG3240C is a 32-inch monitor that uses a VA curved panel with 144 Hertz refresh rates and it’s priced just over 300 pounds. And as such it offers plenty of value for those with a lower spec graphics card or a gaming console. Though there’s a massive issue with it which just isn’t very modern at all and that’s resolution as this is a 32-inch monitor that has a resolution of 1080p Full-HD which if that sounds disappointing to you then chances are you probably are not the target audience of this monitor. Because if you want to use this as a proper computer monitor you want to do spreadsheets productivity of any description really. Then it’s just not great at all as even the most modest of the general user will notice that there is pixelation around text and there’s just not very much detail. It’s certainly usable but you will never really enjoyed using it in stop having to sip this. Though it is a VA panel and the outright image quality isn’t actually too bad at all. Viewing angles are far from the best you’ve ever seen the contrast in color is fairly pleasing to the eye and it’s a big step up from a TN for sure.

RELATED:  Dell Alienware AW2721D vs  AOC Porsche Design Agon PD27: Gaming Monitor Comparision

Now gaming is arguably the best way to use this monitor and it has all the right technologies we mean it’s 144 Hertz it’s got free sync and it’s curved and large-sized are great for gaming. As long as you can get past the resolution for the right audience we don’t think it will be a concern as 1080p is very easy to drive even at 144 Hertz and the lower resolution is less noticeable than it would be on the desktop.

BenQ EX3203R

BenQ EX3203R

This is a 32-inch quad HD monitor that has 144 Hertz refresh rate. It is a curved VA panel with FreeSync to technology and HDR. So it sounds very similar to the other high-end monitors. A 32-inch monitor like this that has quad HD resolution has a pixel density of 93 and that is pretty much as sharp as a 24-inch screen with a full HD display would be. Now for most gamers and all-around users that are going to edit some pictures or edit a family video is going to be just fine actually. It’s going to be very nice but if you are a creative professional you are gonna miss a bit of sharpness. So you should get a screen that has a higher resolution for this size and a higher pixel density now from a gaming point of view.

However, 32 inches impressive and the larger size definitely adds to the immersion we do think it’s a bit too large. If you are serious about games where every millisecond counts but for the majority of other games we would say bigger is better also 1440p is still very reasonable to dry with a mid-range graphics card. Where 34-inch ultra-wide quad HD screen or larger 4k screens would require a more expensive GPU. Now we have to know that these larger VA panels, in general, are a bit slower than what you would expect from a typical TN gaming panel.

RELATED:  Curved Monitors: MSI MPG27CQ 27 vs Gigabyte Aorus CV27F 27

Connectivity

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
HDMI2.0 x 22.0 x 2
DisplayPort1.4 x 11.4 x 1
Audio Output3.5 mm3.5 mm
HDCPYesYes V2.2
USB3.0 x 4 downstream
3.0 x 1 upstream
Type-C x 1
RJ45NoNo
Built-in SpeakersYes 2 x 6 WNo
G-SYNC SupportNoNo
FreeSync SupportYesYes

ViewSonic XG3240C

Going towards the connectivity, it comes with two HDMI 2.0 ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, and more interestingly it also gets two audio jacks. Also, it got two 6W combined speakers including a 5W amplifier In terms of the USB connections there’s a quad-USB 3.0 hub, two at the rear of the monitor and two at the side for more comfortable access.

BenQ EX3203R

You get a DisplayPort connection and two HDMI connections in the back so that is enough for your PC and consoles as well as the USB type-c port the USB type-c port is great if you have a laptop you want to connect to it however with 10 watts of max power delivery you cannot charge your laptop with it, at the same time you also get a two-port USB hub and a 3.5-millimeter jack for your headset but what this screen doesn’t have is built-in speakers.

Power

ViewSonic XG3240CBenQ EX3203R
Power On100-240VAC,50/60Hz100-240VAC,50/60Hz
Power SupplyExternalExternal
DC Input Power

In terms of power options, ViewSonic XG3240C requires a 7.4 x 5.1 x 12.5 DC connector and needed AC 100-240V 50/60Hz voltage and it consumes a 41W of power on the running mode. On the other hand, the BenQ EX3203R comes with a voltage rating of 100 – 240V and it also requires Power Consumption (sleep mode) 0.5W and Power Consumption (max) on running mode it requires power consumption of 100W.

Which is better!

The BenQ EX3203R remains a comparatively modern monitor. BenQ EX3203R gets an outstanding contrast ratio of 3000: 1. BenQ EX3203R holds a total input lag of 11 ms, which remains the best amongst the competition. Whereas on the other hand for the remarkably fast frame rates, the ViewSonic VX3258-2KC-MHD possesses a supreme refresh rate of 144 Hz that enables more lustrous gameplay.